ArticleHeliyon2023
Electricity price forecast based on the STL-TCN-NBEATS model.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salt rock creep deformation forecasting using deep neural networks and analytical models for subsurface energy storage applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Combining knowledge distillation and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SMGformer: integrating STL and multi-head self-attention in deep learning model for multi-step runoff forecasting.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Taking long-term high-frequency electricity price data as the research content, this paper proposes seasonal and trend decomposition using loess-temporal convolutional network-neural basis expansion analysis for an interpretable time series forecasting (STL-TCN-NBEATS) model to solve the problems of low forecast accuracy caused by high volatility, high frequency and nonlinearity and poor interpretability of the deep learning model. By comparing the forecast effects of the temporal convolutional network-long short-term memory (TCN-LSTM), LSTM and other models, the main conclusions are as follows: (1) The hybrid model, STL-TCN-NBEATS, selected in this paper can effectively solve the problem of low forecast accuracy after reasonable selection of model parameters. The evaluation indexes of the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were 3.7441 and 4.5044, respectively, which were 3.1416 and 2.1336 lower than those of the second-best model (TCN-LSTM). Compared with the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA), the accuracy was improved by approximately 49.18% (RMSE) and 60.35% (MAPE). (2) The STL-TCN-NBEATS model has better feature extraction ability, so it can obtain higher forecast accuracy. Since the construction of the TCN introduces extended causal convolution and residual blocks, the deep learning network model has better processing ability and robustness for large sample time series. Moreover, the NBEATS network structure enables the model to be trained quickly, and the experimental results verify the effectiveness and high accuracy of this method. (3) The model not only has high precision but also has some interpretability. By decomposing time series data into a trend term, period term and remainder term, the NBEATS and the TCN are used to process the trend term, period term and remainder term, respectively, so that the hybrid model can forecast electricity prices according to the traditional time series processing mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.