Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36820160›Full record

ArticleJournal of otology2023

Development, and validation of non-speech dichotic listening test.

Hari Prakash Palaniswamy, Mayur Bhat, Rajashree Ganesh Bhat, Y Krishna, B Rajashekhar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-verbal dichotic listening: A new cognitive hearing test for dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hari Prakash PalaniswamyDept of Speech and Hearing Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Mayur BhatDept of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Rajashree Ganesh BhatDept of Speech and Hearing Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Y KrishnaSpeech and Hearing Unit, College of Applied Medical Science, King Khalid University, Abha, 62529, Saudi Arabia.
B RajashekharDept of Speech and Hearing Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INKing Khalid University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Classic dichotic listening tests using speech stimuli result in right ear advantage, due to the dominant crossed pathway for speech and language. It is presumed that similar crossed dominance could exist for non-speech stimuli too. Hence, this is an attempt to develop and validate the dichotic non-speech test using environmental stimuli and explore the effect of focused attention on this test. Materials and method: Three lists of dichotic stimuli were created using these sounds with fifteen tokens in each list. Four professionals and non-professionals validated these materials. Normative estimation was obtained by administering the newly developed test on 70 adults and 70 children using a free-recall and forced-recall condition. Result: The results showed a significant difference between the left ear and right scores where the left ear score was better than the right, depicting left ear advantage (LEA) for free recall condition in both groups. In the forced recall condition, LEA was not seen; rather the mean score was significantly higher in the attended ear, irrespective of the stimuli presented to the right or left ear. The test-retest reliability in free recall was good in both the ears and moderate for forced right ear conditions. Conclusion: The novel test consistently showed LEA with good reliability and can be used to assess the hemispheric asymmetry in normal subjects and also in test batteries for the clinical population.

Indexed as

Cerebral dominanceDichotic listening testHemispheric specializationLeft cerebral hemisphereRight cerebral hemisphere

Identifiers

PMID36820160
PMCPMC9937819
OpenAlexW4313252368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.