ArticleACS nanoscience Au2023
Importance of Metal Biotransformation in Cell Response to Metallic Nanoparticles: A Transcriptomic Meta-analysis Study.
Article in ACS nanoscience Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Manganese-Doped Carbon Nanodots as Next-Generation MRI and Fluorescence Imaging Agents.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Phenomic and Transcriptomic Profiling of ZnS QD Response inNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biodegradable Aurum: Gold Nanosheets Undergo Biodegradation by Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase.Small science · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Profiling of Mouse Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exposed to Metal-Based Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Dynamic QSAR modeling for predicting in vivo genotoxicity and inflammation induced by nanoparticles and advanced materials: a time-dose-property/response approach.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Nanotoxicology: developments and new insights.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Green-synthesized silver nanoparticles induced apoptotic cell death in CACO2 cancer cells by activating MLH1 gene expression.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Prospects for the Use of Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Adjuvants for Local Cancer Immunotherapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metallic nanoparticles are increasingly present in our environment, raising concerns on their interactions with living organisms and potential toxicity. Indeed, metallic nanoparticles release metal ions that can be toxic, bioessential, therapeutically active, or combine several of these features. However, human cell responses to different metallic nanoparticles and ions have rarely been compared so far. We propose here a meta-analysis of the transcriptomic responses of human cells to nanoparticles and ions of various metals (titanium, iron, copper, zinc, silver, cadmium, platinum, gold), in order to identify the commonalities and differences between cell responses to these compounds. This analysis revealed that the chemical properties of metals are more important than their known biological functions (i.e., essential metals, toxicity) in governing the cell transcriptome. Particularly, we evidence that the response to nanoparticles is dominated by the response to the ions they contain, and depend on the nanoparticles' solubility. The formulation as nanoparticles impacts the cell response at lower intensity than the released ions, by altering genes related to vesicle intracellular transport and the cytoskeleton. Moreover, we put into light that several metals (i.e., copper, zinc, silver, cadmium, and gold) trigger a common cell response governed by metallothioneins, which coexist with singular signatures that are specific to a given element.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.