Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819996›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Impact of public sentiments on the transmission of COVID-19 across a geographical gradient.

Folashade B Agusto, Eric Numfor, Karthik Srinivasan, Enahoro A Iboi, Alexander Fulk, Jarron M Saint Onge, A Townsend Peterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chaos in Opinion-Driven Disease Dynamics.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A mathematical model for the co-dynamics of COVID-19 and tuberculosis.Mathematics and computers in simulation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Folashade B AgustoUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6137-6480
Eric NumforAugusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States.
Karthik SrinivasanUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.
Enahoro A IboiSpelman College, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Alexander FulkUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.
Jarron M Saint OngeUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0914-4882
A Townsend PetersonUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-2379
University of Kansas · USAugusta University Health · USSpelman College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is a respiratory disease caused by a recently discovered, novel coronavirus, SARS-COV-2. The disease has led to over 81 million confirmed cases of COVID-19, with close to two million deaths. In the current social climate, the risk of COVID-19 infection is driven by individual and public perception of risk and sentiments. A number of factors influences public perception, including an individual's belief system, prior knowledge about a disease and information about a disease. In this article, we develop a model for COVID-19 using a system of ordinary differential equations following the natural history of the infection. The model uniquely incorporates social behavioral aspects such as quarantine and quarantine violation. The model is further driven by people's sentiments (positive and negative) which accounts for the influence of disinformation. People's sentiments were obtained by parsing through and analyzing COVID-19 related tweets from Twitter, a social media platform across six countries. Our results show that our model incorporating public sentiments is able to capture the trend in the trajectory of the epidemic curve of the reported cases. Furthermore, our results show that positive public sentiments reduce disease burden in the community. Our results also show that quarantine violation and early discharge of the infected population amplifies the disease burden on the community. Hence, it is important to account for public sentiment and individual social behavior in epidemic models developed to study diseases like COVID-19.

Indexed as

Body FluidsCOVID-19AttitudeCost of IllnessHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Human behaviorSensitivity analysisSentiment analysisTwitter tweets

Identifiers

PMID36819996
PMCPMC9938658
OpenAlexW4320918894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.