Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819928›Full record

Observational studyTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2023

Urinary Symptoms Are Unrelated to Leukocyte Esterase and Nitrite Among Indwelling Catheter Users.

Amanda K Rounds, Rochelle E Tractenberg, Suzanne L Groah, Jamie K Frost, Inger H Ljungberg, Herminio Navia, Cynthia T Pham

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. IntravesicalTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda K RoundsMedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0238-4629
Rochelle E TractenbergCollaborative for Research on Outcomes and Metrics, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1121-2119
Suzanne L GroahMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-1959
Jamie K FrostCollaborative for Research on Outcomes and Metrics, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-9705
Inger H LjungbergMedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland.
Herminio NaviaGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Cynthia T PhamGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9247-6396
Georgetown University · USMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the association between dipstick results and urinary symptoms. Method: This was a prospective 12-month observational study of real-time self-administered urine dipstick results and symptoms in a community setting that included 52 spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) participants with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) who use an indwelling catheter. Symptoms were collected using the Urinary Symptom Questionnaire for Neurogenic Bladder-Indwelling Catheter (USQNB-IDC). The USQNB-IDC includes actionable (A), bladder (B1), urine quality (B2), and other (C) symptoms; analyses focused on A, B1, and B2 symptoms. Dipstick results include nitrite (NIT +/-), and leukocyte esterase (LE; negative, trace, small, moderate, or large). Dipstick outcomes were defined as strong positive (LE = moderate/large and NIT+), inflammation positive (LE = moderate/large and NIT-), negative (LE = negative/trace and NIT-), and indeterminate (all others). Results: Nitrite positive dipsticks and moderate or large LE positive dipsticks were each observed in over 50% of the sample in every week. Strong positive dipstick results were observed in 35% to 60% of participants in every week. A, B1, or B2 symptoms co-occurred less than 50% of the time with strong positive dipsticks, but they also co-occurred with negative dipsticks. Participants were asymptomatic with a strong positive dipstick an average of 30.2% of the weeks. On average, 73% of the time a person had a negative dipstick, they also had no key symptoms (95% CI, .597-.865). Conclusion: No association was observed between A, B1, and B2 symptoms and positive dipstick. A negative dipstick with the absence of key symptoms may better support clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord DiseasesSpinal Cord InjuriesUrinary Tract InfectionsCarboxylic Ester HydrolasesCatheters, IndwellingHumansNitritesPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesUrinary BladderCarboxylic Ester Hydrolasesleukocyte esteraseNitritesindwelling catheterspinal cord injuryurinary dipstickurinary symptomsurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID36819928
PMCPMC9936899
OpenAlexW4320901933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.