ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2023
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patient with non-calcified bicuspid aortic valve: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severe Trileaflet Aortic Stenosis Without Significant Valve Calcification in an Older Adult.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026Article
- Relationship of resting echocardiography combined with serum micronutrients to the severity of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-calcified aortic stenosis (AS) is rare and is associated with a high risk of transcatheter valve embolization and migration (TVEM) because aortic valve complex calcification is important for stable anchoring of the prosthesis. Therefore, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for non-calcified AS is not preferred. However, a universally accepted strategy for TAVI in such patients is not yet established. Case summary: A 69-year-old woman with symptomatic severe AS and a high surgical risk was admitted to our institution for TAVI. Pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) revealed a non-calcified bicuspid aortic valve. Implantation of a 23 mm self-expandable valve (SEV) was planned according to the manufacturer's recommended optimal size based on CT measurements. Intraoperatively, the 23 mm SEV did not snugly fit at the aortic apparatus level. Thus, we deployed a 26 mm SEV with stable anchoring because of the stronger radial force. She was discharged without any complication. Echocardiography at 3 months follow-up showed a well-functioning transcatheter heart valve (THV) without migration or paravalvular leakage. Discussion: In our patient with non-calcified bicuspid AS, an SEV that was one size larger than the optimal as measured on CT was successfully implanted without THV embolization. An upsized SEV may be considered when performing TAVI in patients with severe non-calcified AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.