Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819818›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2022

Retrospective analysis: checkpoint inhibitor accessibility for thoracic and head and neck cancers and factors influencing it in a tertiary centre in India.

Vijay Patil, George Abraham, Madala Ravikrishna, Atanu Bhattacharjee, Vanita Noronha, Deevyashali Parekh, Nandini Menon, Jyoti Bajpai, Kumar Prabhash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vijay PatilThese authors contributed equally.
George AbrahamThese authors contributed equally.
Madala RavikrishnaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center and HBNI, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Atanu BhattacharjeeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center and HBNI, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center and HBNI, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Deevyashali ParekhDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center and HBNI, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Nandini MenonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center and HBNI, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Jyoti BajpaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center and HBNI, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center and HBNI, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access to cancer care is an issue in low and low middle-income countries. The problem is worse with respect to access to new therapies like checkpoint inhibitors. Hence, we decided to audit our practice in the head and neck and thoracic medical oncology unit from 2015 to 2019 to study the accessibility of checkpoint inhibitors and factors influencing it. Methods: All patients who were registered in the head and neck and thoracic medical oncology unit between 2015 and 2019 were included in the study. Patients who received immunotherapy were identified from the prospective database of immunotherapy maintained by the department. We made a list of patients who were eligible for immunotherapy per year and identified how many of them received recommended immunotherapy. The indication for eligibility of immunotherapy was based on published pivotal data and it was applicable from the date of publication of the study online. Descriptive statistics were performed. For nominal and ordinal variable percentage with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was provided. Factors impacting the accessibility of immunotherapy were identified. Findings: A total of 15,674 patients were identified who required immunotherapy; out of them only 444 (2.83%, 95% CI: 2.58-3.1) received it. Among head and neck cancer patients, 4.5% (156 out of 3,435) received immunotherapy versus 2.35% (288 out of 12,239) among thoracic cancer patients ( Conclusion: The accessibility of immunotherapy is below 3% in India. Patients with head and neck cancers, those registered as private category and male patients had higher access to this therapy. There was also a temporal trend observed suggesting increased accessibility over the years.

Indexed as

accessibilitycheckpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapylow & middle-income countries

Identifiers

PMID36819818
PMCPMC9934881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.