Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819806›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2022

Situational analysis of the quality of palliative care services across India: a cross-sectional survey.

Arunangshu Ghoshal, Anjum Khan Joad, Odette Spruijt, Shobha Nair, M R Rajagopal, Firuza Patel, Anuja Damani, Jayita Deodhar, Dinesh Goswami, Geeta Joshi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Palliative medicine reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Arunangshu GhoshalDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Anjum Khan JoadDepartment of Anaesthesia and Palliative Care Medicine, Bhagwan Mahaveer Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Jaipur 302017, India.
Odette SpruijtFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Shobha NairDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Amrita Hospital, Kochi 682041, India.
M R RajagopalTrivandrum Institute of Palliative Sciences and Pallium India, Aisha Memorial Hospital Building, Paruthikuzhy, Thiruvananthapuram 695009, India.
Firuza PatelDepartment of Radiotherapy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Anuja DamaniDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Jayita DeodharDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Dinesh GoswamiGuwahati Pain and Palliative Care Society, Uzan Bazar, Guwahati, Assam 781001, India.
Geeta JoshiCommunity Oncology Center, Gujarat Cancer Society, Ahmedabad 380007, India.
Savita ButolaBorder Security Force Sector Hospital, Panisagar, Tripura 799260, India.
Charu SinghDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Amrita Hospital, Kochi 682041, India.
Seema Rajesh RaoBHT Karunashraya, Bengaluru 560037, India.
Madhura BhatwadekarPalliative Care Social Worker, Pune, Maharashtra 411058, India.
Mary Ann MuckadenDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Sushma BhatnagarDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. B.R.A Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Palliative care services in India were established in the 1980s but there is no detailed up-to-date knowledge about the quality-of-service provision nationally. We aim to describe the current quality of palliative care provision in India, as measured against nationally adopted standards. Method: A digital survey adapted from the Indian Association of Palliative Care Standards Audit Tool was administered to 250 palliative care centres. Results: Two hundred and twenty-three (89%) palliative care centres participated - 26.4% were government-run, while the rest include non-governmental organisations, private hospitals, community-led initiatives and hospices. About 200 centres 'often' or 'always' fulfilled 16/21 desirable criteria; however, only 2/15 essential criteria were 'often' or 'always' fulfilled. Only 5.8% provide uninterrupted access to oral morphine. Significance of the results: Palliative care centres in India are falling short of meeting the essential quality standards, indicating the urgent need for new initiatives to drive national change.

Indexed as

Indiapalliative carequality improvementsurvey

Identifiers

PMID36819806
PMCPMC9934966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.