Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819746›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2023

Assessment of the Factors Influencing the Patient's Comprehension of the Informed Consent to Interventional Pain Procedures.

Mohammad Ghorbanhoseini, Kyle Kang, Allen Yang, Mohammadreza Abbasian, Eduard Vaynberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad GhorbanhoseiniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 750 Albany Street 2R, Boston 02118, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6477-0133
Kyle KangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7054-882X
Allen YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8808-6512
Mohammadreza AbbasianPostdoctoral Research Fellow, Musculoskeletal Translational Innovation Initiative, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-8213
Eduard VaynbergChronic Pain Management, Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2518-5040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Informed consent is the first step of every medical procedure and is considered a standard of care for patients undergoing medical interventions. Our study seeks to evaluate patients' understanding of the procedure they consented to and the factors affecting the degree of understanding. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used an anonymous postprocedural questionnaire to assess our patients' understanding of the procedure being performed and their level of satisfaction. It was conducted between June 2021 and January 2022 on every consenting patient who declined English interpreter services and was undergoing a first elective lumbar epidural steroid injection. Results: The mean age of 201 subjects was 57.3 (23-90) years, with a race distribution of Black (44.3%), White (31.8%), and other races (23.9%). 15.9% of our subjects worked in the medical field. Older age and patients identified as Black and other races had a positive correlation with the propensity to predict a poor understanding of consent. This study failed to demonstrate any difference in understanding of informed consent content between the different subgroups when stratified by assigned sex at birth, level of education, and profession. Patients' expectation from the treatment was classified as desperate (will take any help they can) in 78 patients (38.8%), feeling hopeful (expecting partial improvement in their symptoms) in 52 patients (25.9%), and being optimistic (will obtain full recovery from this injection) in 71 patients (35.3%). 192 patients (95.5%) were very satisfied with the consent process. Seven patients (3.5%) stated that they wanted more information, and 2 patients (1.0%) did not understand the explanation. 180 patients (89.6%) were satisfied with the overall experience, while 21 patients (10.4%) were not. The Wilks test (likelihood-ratio test) resulted in a Conclusions: Although patients carry a variable expectation of procedures, most patients in our pain clinic have a high level of satisfaction despite having a poor understanding of the procedure provided via informed consent. Although our patients' level of objective comprehension is low, those with a better understanding of the procedure tend to have a more satisfactory experience.

Indexed as

ComprehensionInformed ConsentPain ManagementAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36819746
PMCPMC9931461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.