Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819724›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023

Feasibility and potential cognitive impact of a cognitive-motor dual-task training program using a custom exergame in older adults: A pilot study.

Matthieu Gallou-Guyot, Stephane Mandigout, Romain Marie, Louise Robin, Jean-Christophe Daviet, Anaick Perrochon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04803799 (Effects of an Exergame Focused on Cognitive-motor Interference on the Cognitive and Motor Capacities of Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04803799 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of an Exergame Focused on Cognitive-motor Interference on the Cognitive and Motor Capacities of Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LimogesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsAgeingArmsTraining Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthieu Gallou-GuyotLaboratoire HAVAE (UR20217), Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Stephane MandigoutLaboratoire HAVAE (UR20217), Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Romain MarieInstitut d'Ingénierie Informatique de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Louise RobinLaboratoire HAVAE (UR20217), Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Jean-Christophe DavietLaboratoire HAVAE (UR20217), Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Anaick PerrochonLaboratoire HAVAE (UR20217), Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Université de Limoges · FRCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dual-task training may be relevant and efficient in the context of active aging. An issue in training programs lies in enhancing the adherence of participants. This can potentially be improved using games as support. We designed and developed a custom interactive exergame in this way. The objective of this pilot study was to explore the potential use of this exergame and the feasibility of our intervention, including the level of safety and adherence. The result's trends on cognitive and motor capacities, as well as on the level of motivation for physical activity, fear of falling, and quality of life of participants, were also explored. Methods: Older adults aged 65 years or older were recruited and realized 30 min of supervised training in groups of 4, 2-3 times a week for 12 weeks. Exercises consisted of incorporated cognitive and motor dual tasks, with an increased difficulty over the weeks. Our program's safety, engagement, attendance, and completion levels were evaluated. Participants' postural control in single-task and dual-task conditions, as well as their performances in mental inhibition, flexibility, working memory, mobility, and postural control, and their levels of motivation for physical activity, fear of falling, and quality of life were also assessed. We realized a per protocol statistical analysis with a Results: Thirty-nine participants (aged 84.6 ± 8.5 years) were recruited. No adverse events, and 89% adherence, 88% attendance, and 87% completion rates were observed. A potentially significant effect of our exergame on working memory in single-task conditions and on the cognitive aspect of dual-task conditions was also observed. We observed no differences in other parameters. Discussion: Our exergame seemed feasible and safe and was enjoyed by participants, mainly due to the gamification of our training program. Moreover, our exergame may be efficient for cognitive training in older adults, as well as for the maintenance of motor functions, motivation for physical activity, fear of falling, and quality of life levels. This constitutes the first step for our solution with interesting results that need to be further studied.

Indexed as

cognitive motor dual taskexergamefeasibilityolder adultstraining

Identifiers

PMID36819724
PMCPMC9932982
OpenAlexW4318984347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.