ArticleSpine surgery and related research2023
Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques for lumbar disc herniation: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Comparative study of clinical effects between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical and Radiologic Analysis of Minimally Invasive Anterior-Posterior Combined Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 (OLIF51) versus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Since 2015, we have performed minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 for various lumbosacral spine disorders using percutaneous pedicle screws. This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results between OLIF at L5/S1 and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single to multilevel degenerative lumbosacral disorders. Methods: A total of 124 patients underwent either OLIF (62 cases) or MIS-TLIF (62 cases). The applied disorders were L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis, pseudarthrosis, adjacent segment degeneration, a combination of L4/5 and L5/S1 pathology, and others. We performed OLIF with posterior percutaneous fixation in the same lateral position. MIS-TLIF was performed with modified cortical bone trajectory screws. The operation time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), JOABPEQ effectiveness rate (%),Visual Analog Scale (VAS), fusion rate, radiologic segmental alignment, and complications were evaluated. Results: The average follow-up periods were 51 and 69 months (24-95) in the OLIF and MIS-TLIF groups, respectively. Furthermore, the average fused segments were 1.6 and 1.5 in each group, respectively. The OT and EBL per segment were 130 min and 56 mL and 100 min and 64 mL, respectively. The JOABPEQ effectiveness rate in the OLIF group demonstrated a statistically higher value in the domains of pain, low-back function, and gait than the MIS-TLIF group ( Conclusions: The OLIF group demonstrated less pain as well as better low-back and gait functions at follow-up. The minimally invasive anterolateral fusion employing OLIF at L5/S1 using percutaneous screws serves as a viable and effective procedure with less residual LBP and high fusion rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.