Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819625›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2023

Current Trends in Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring: A Survey Analysis among Japanese Expert Spine Surgeons.

Hideki Shigematsu, Go Yoshida, Shinji Morito, Masahiro Funaba, Nobuaki Tadokoro, Masaaki Machino, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi, Muneharu Ando, Shigenori Kawabata, Kei Yamada and 13 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in degenerative cervical myelopathy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and postoperative neurological outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Hideki ShigematsuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Go YoshidaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Shinji MoritoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Masahiro FunabaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Nobuaki TadokoroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan.
Masaaki MachinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuyoshi KobayashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Muneharu AndoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Shigenori KawabataDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei YamadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Tsukasa KanchikuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yasushi FujiwaraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shinichirou TaniguchiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi IwasakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Masahito TakahashiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanichiro WadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Naoya YamamotoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
Akimasa YasudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroki UshirozakoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Jun HashimotoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei AndoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yukihiro MatsuyamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Shiro ImagamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPNagoya University · JPKansai Medical University · JPKurume University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPHirosaki University · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital · JPJapan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety · JPKōchi University · JPKyorin University · JPNara Medical University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPTokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center · JPWakayama Medical University · JPYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) is recommended for spine surgeries, there are no guidelines regarding its use in Japan, and its usage is mainly based on the surgeon's preferences. Therefore, this study aimed to provide an overview of the current trends in IONM usage in Japan. Methods: In this web-based survey, expert spine surgeons belonging to the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding IONM management. The questionnaire covered various aspects of IONM usage, including the preferred modality, operation of IONM, details regarding muscle-evoked potential after electrical stimulation of the brain (Br(E)-MsEP), and need for consistent use of IONM in major spine surgeries. Results: Responses were received from 134 of 186 expert spine surgeons (response rate, 72%). Of these, 124 respondents used IONM routinely. Medical staff rarely performed IONM without a medical doctor. Br(E)-MsEP was predominantly used for IONM. One-third of the respondents reported complications, such as bite injuries caused by Br(E)-MsEP. Interestingly, two-thirds of the respondents did not plan responses to alarm points. Intramedullary spinal cord tumor, scoliosis (idiopathic, congenital, or neuromuscular in pediatric), and thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were representative diseases that require IONM. Conclusions: IONM has become an essential tool in Japan, and Br(E)-MsEP is a predominant modality for IONM at present. Although we investigated spine surgeries for which consistent use of IONM is supported, a cost-benefit analysis may be required.

Indexed as

alarm pointBr(E)-MsEPcomplicationsintraoperative neuromonitoringJapanmultimodality IONMsurvey

Identifiers

PMID36819625
PMCPMC9931408
OpenAlexW4312839341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.