Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Continuity of Care and Coordination of Care: Can they Be Differentiated?

Chi-Chen Chen, Yi-Chen Chiang, Yi-Chieh Lin, Shou-Hsia Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chi-Chen ChenDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2372-4381
Yi-Chen ChiangSchool of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9630-1956
Yi-Chieh LinDepartment of Public health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-9550
Shou-Hsia ChengInstitute of Health Policy & Management, College of Public Health and Population Health Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-9934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Both care continuity and coordination are considered essential elements of health care system. However, little is known about the relationship between care continuity and coordination. This study aimed to differentiate the concepts of care continuity and coordination by developing and testing the reliability and validity of the Combined Outpatient Care Continuity and Coordination Assessment (COCCCA) questionnaire under the universal coverage health care system in Taiwan from a patient perspective. Methods: Face-to-face interviews were conducted nationwide with community-dwelling older adults selected via stratified multistage systematic sampling with probability-proportional-to-size process. A total of 2,144 subjects completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 44.67%. Results: The 16 items of the COCCCA questionnaire were identified via item analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). The PCA generated five dimensions: three continuity-oriented (interpersonal, information sharing and longitudinal between patients and physicians) and two coordination-oriented (information exchange and communication/cooperation among multiple physicians). The second-order confirmatory factor analysis supported the factor structure and indicated that distinct constructs of care continuity and coordination can be identified. Conclusion: The COCCCA instrument can differentiate the concepts of care continuity and care coordination and has been demonstrated to be valid and reliable in outpatient care settings from a patient perspective.

Indexed as

care continuitycare coordinationoutpatient settingpsychometric analysisquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID36819617
PMCPMC9936907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.