Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819613›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

The Implementation of Integrated Health Information Systems - Research Studies from 7 Countries Involving the InterRAI Assessment System.

Johanna de Almeida Mello, Nathalie Ih Wellens, Kirsten Hermans, Matthieu De Stampa, Valérie Cerase, Natalie Vereker, Pálmi V Jónsson, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Brigette Meehan, Anja Declercq

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Skin Ulcer Development and Deterioration of Social Engagement among Nursing Home Residents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to assess the structural validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit Proxy version (ASCOT-Proxy) completed by care home staff.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of the Concurrent Validity of the Oral Health Screening Tool (OHS) in the Mental Health Care Setting: A Pilot Study.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johanna de Almeida MelloLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1262-318X
Nathalie Ih WellensLa Source School of Nursing, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9372-1960
Kirsten HermansLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6126-2907
Matthieu De StampaCentre Gérontologique Départemental, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7238-5913
Valérie CeraseCentre Gérontologique Départemental, Marseille, France.
Natalie VerekerinterRAI Ireland, Change and Innovation, Health Services Executive (HSE), Ireland.
Pálmi V JónssonDepartment of Geriatrics, Landspitali University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Iceland.
Harriet Finne-SoveriFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8836-1860
Brigette MeehanTechnical Advisory Services (TAS), interRAI New Zealand, New Zealand.
Anja DeclercqLUCAS - Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3136-124X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the past years, governments from several countries have shown interest in implementing integrated health information systems. The interRAI Suite of instruments fits this concept, as it is a set of standardised, evidence-based assessments, which have been validated for different care settings. The system allows the electronic transfer of information across care settings, enabling integration of care and providing support for care planning and quality monitoring. The main purpose of this research is to describe the recent implementation process of the interRAI instruments in seven countries: Belgium, Switzerland, France, Ireland, Iceland, Finland and New Zealand. Methods: The study applied a case study methodology with the focus on the implementation strategies in each country. Principal investigators gathered relevant information from multiple sources and summarised it according to specific aspects of the implementation process, comparing them across countries. The main implementation aspects are described, as well as the main advantages and barriers perceived by the users. Results: The seven case studies showed that adequate staffing, appropriate information technology, availability of hardware, professional collaboration and continuous training are perceived as important factors which can contribute to the implementation of the interRAI instruments. In addition, the use of electronic standardised assessment instruments such as the interRAI Suite provided evidence to improve decision-making and quality of care, enabling resource planning and benchmarking. Conclusion: In practice, the implementation of health information systems is a process that requires a cultural shift of policymakers and professional caregivers at all levels of health policy and service delivery. Information about the implementation process of the interRAI Suite in different countries can help investigators and policymakers to better plan this implementation. This research sheds light on the advantages and pitfalls of the implementation of the interRAI Suite of instruments and proposes approaches to overcome difficulties.

Indexed as

digital health assessmentintegrated careintegrated systeminterRAI Suite

Identifiers

PMID36819613
PMCPMC9936911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.