Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819599›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2023

Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study.

Melek Belevcikli, Halenur Altan, Osman Demir

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07498621 (Assessment of Maxillary Local Anesthesia Infiltration Efficiency and Adult Patient Satisfaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07498621 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Maxillary Local Anesthesia Infiltration Efficiency and Adult Patient Satisfaction: Needle-free Jet vs Conventional Syringe in Simple Tooth Extraction in a Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Abdulaziz UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsPain Perception of the New DeviceArmsneedle-free anesthesia jet (Comfort-in™), Conventional dental syringe injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melek BelevcikliDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-0360
Halenur AltanDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3648-5989
Osman DemirDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1322-2716
Bülent Ecevit University · TRNecmettin Erbakan University · TRTokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: Pain management is one of the most important factors affecting the success of pediatric dentistry. Therefore, new needle- and pain-free local anesthesia techniques have been developed in parallel with technological advancements. The purpose of this study is to compare the pain perception and dental anxiety levels associated with a needle-free injection system (Comfort-in™) and the classic needle method during treatment-required infiltration anesthesia in children. Methods: This randomized controlled crossover split-mouth clinical study included 94 children who required dental treatment with local anesthesia using a dental needle or needle-free injection system for the bilateral primary molars. The Wong-Baker Scale (WBS) was used to measure pain perception at different times, and the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS) was used to measure the anxiety level of the child. A statistical software package was used to process the data. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: There was no significant difference between the needle-free injection system and dental needle method during the induction stage for filling and pulpotomy (P > 0.05). "Pain on postoperative 1st day" was similar in both types of anesthesia (P = 0.750). Conclusions: The needle-free injection system was as effective as the dental needle method. The Comfort-in™ system was an acceptable alternative for patients during the postoperative period. Understanding how pain management may be provided during local anesthesia administration and a child's fear and anxiety regarding the dentist may lead to better dental compliance.

Indexed as

ChildrenDental AnxietyJet InjectionLocal AnesthesiaPain Assessment

Identifiers

PMID36819599
PMCPMC9911968
OpenAlexW4319993497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.