ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023
Reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament rupture using the ligament advanced reinforcement system artificial ligament-comparisons between patients over 50 years and under 50 years.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the increasing physical activity level in elderly population, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are becoming more frequent. Due to the possible surgery complications, treatment for ACL rupture in patients with advanced age is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of reconstruction using the ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) artificial ligament in patients older than 50 and patients younger than 50 with chronic ACL rupture. Methods: Indications included: (I) concurrent history of subjective symptomatic anterior knee instability despite nonoperative rehabilitation for least 3 months, (II) positive preoperative Lachman and pivot shift tests, (III) ACL stump still connecting the femur with the tibia as demonstrated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and (IV) some residual ligament fibers still connecting the femur with the tibia as demonstrated by arthroscopy. Participants were divided into groups based on their age. Participants were divided into groups based on their age. A total of 37 patients who underwent reconstruction of chronic ACL rupture using the LARS artificial ligament were divided into group A (≥50 years, n=16) and group B (<50 years, n=21). Results: The outcome measures were compared between the 2 groups. These included the baseline clinical data, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring system, Pivot shift test, Lachman test, Kneelax arthrometer measurements, Tegner activity scale, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic classification of arthritis and complications. Postoperative knee laxity and the functional examination were significantly improved compared to preoperative measurements for both groups (all P<0.01). No significant differences were found in postoperative knee laxity and functional examination between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). The level of osteoarthritis did not statistically increase in either group during follow-up (all P>0.05). No complications associated with the arthroscopic surgery were found in either group. Conclusions: The reconstruction of chronic ACL rupture using the LARS artificial ligament showed similar therapeutic effects in patients over the age of 50 and those under the age of 50.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.