Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819581›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023

A comparison of Doppler measures of ovarian blood flow between women with and without ovarian dysfunction and correlations of Doppler indices with ovarian dysfunction markers: a meta-analysis.

Wei-Qiang Wang, Guang-Hua Chu, Xiao-Xia Hou

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multimodal ultrasound assessment of ovarian reserve.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei-Qiang WangDepartment of Gynecology II, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Guang-Hua ChuDepartment of Gynecology II, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Xiao-Xia HouMedical Ultrasound Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Doppler ultrasonography is used to study ovarian vascular characteristics. However, the outcomes are reported with a considerable variability in literature. Here we review the differences in Doppler ultrasound-measured ovarian blood flow indices between women with and without ovarian dysfunction and seeks correlations between Doppler measures and ovarian markers. Methods: A literature search was conducted in electronic databases (Google Scholar, Ovid, PubMed, Science Direct, and Springer) to identify studies that used Doppler for ovarian blood flow examination and reported Doppler measures in women with and without ovarian dysfunction and/or the correlations between wDoppler indices and markers of ovarian dysfunction. After quality assessment of included studies, a meta-analysis of weighted mean differences (WMDs) between women with and without ovarian dysfunction in vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), vascularization flow index (VFI), pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) was performed. Correlation coefficients between Doppler indices and markers of ovarian dysfunction were pooled to achieve overall estimates. Results: A total of 27 studies [2,377 women with ovarian dysfunction and 308 controls; age 27.7 years, 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.4 to 29.1] were included. These studies were of moderate quality. The VI (WMD 9.75; P<0.0001), FI (WMD 2.73; P<0.0001), and VFI (WMD 1.29; P<0.0001) were significantly higher whereas PI (WMD -1.08; P=0.001) and RI (WMD -0.26; P<0.0001) were significantly lower in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) than in normal women. In women undergoing Conclusions: Doppler indices are found significantly different in women with and without ovarian dysfunction and have significant correlations with markers of ovarian dysfunction. These results support the use of Doppler ultrasound to examine ovarian dysfunction. High statistical heterogeneity observed herein should be studies in future investigations.

Indexed as

blood-flowcorrelationDoppler ultrasonographyovarian dysfunctionstroma

Identifiers

PMID36819581
PMCPMC9929747
OpenAlexW4320007662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.