ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023
Efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with recurrent uterine malignancy: a prospective, single-center, single-arm, phase 2 study.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Review
- Molecular Insights in Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas: Exploring New Targets for Novel Therapeutic Approaches.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Engineered Endometrial Clear Cell Cancer-on-a-Chip Reveals Early Invasion-Metastasis Cascade of Cancer Cells.Biomaterials research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Apatinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, has clinical activity in recurrent/advanced gynecological cancers. However, its efficacy in uterine malignancy remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent apatinib in patients with recurrent uterine malignancy. Methods: This is a prospective single-center, single-arm, phase 2 study that enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with histopathologically confirmed recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) and recurrent uterine sarcoma (US), received at least 2 chemotherapy regimens, and an Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 0-1. Apatinib (500 mg) was administered orally once daily. A treatment cycle was defined as 4 weeks. The patients were followed up every 2 cycles for tumor radiological assessment until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the treatment and within 30 days of the last study treatment and graded as per the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Version 4.0. Results: A total of 33 patients (22 with EC and 11 with US) were enrolled between October 2018 and April 2021. Median follow-up duration was 11.7 months (interquartile range: 6.8-32.5 months). The patients received apatinib for a median of 4.79 cycles (range 2-13 cycles). In the EC and US cohorts, the ORRs were 27.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.7% to 50.2%] and 9.1% (95% CI, 0.2% to 41.3%), the median PFS were 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.7 months) and 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.2 to 11.6 months), and the median OS were 11.7 months (95% CI, 6.8 months to not reached) and 18.1 months (95% CI, 9.2 months to not reached), respectively. The most common treatment-related AEs of all grades were hypertension (36.4%), proteinuria (33.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (30.3%). No treatment-related serious AEs or deaths occurred. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study assessing the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with uterine malignancy. The results suggested that apatinib might be a potential treatment option for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.