Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819501›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2023

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a narrative review on its various uses in non-breast reconstruction.

Claire Guinier, Eloi de Clermont-Tonnerre, Jing Qin Tay, Zhi Yang Ng, Curtis L Cetrulo, Alexandre G Lellouch

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire GuinierVascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Eloi de Clermont-TonnerreVascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jing Qin TayPlastic Surgery, School of Surgery, Oxford, UK.
Zhi Yang NgPlastic Surgery, School of Surgery, Oxford, UK.
Curtis L CetruloVascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexandre G LellouchVascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHôpital Tenon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap was first described by Koshima and Soeda in 1989 and is now well-established as the gold standard in breast reconstruction. Lately, this issue has been explored in the context of head and neck reconstruction, highlighting growing interest in the use of the DIEP flap beyond breast reconstruction, but its usage in other anatomical regions appears elusive. Nevertheless, DIEP flap reconstruction may be a viable choice for complex, three-dimensional head and neck deformities while upholding the criteria of minimal donor site morbidity, according to a recent review. To determine whether the DIEP flap may be used successfully in other types of reconstruction, we conducted a review on the use, applications, and outcomes of the DIEP flap in non-breast reconstruction. This is, as far as we are aware, the first comprehensive analysis of all applications of the DIEP flap other than for breast reconstruction. Methods: A literature review was performed using PubMed to include all relevant articles in English or French published up to February 2022. Keywords included "DIEP flap" and "deep inferior epigastric perforator flap". Key Contents and Findings: A total of 1,299 articles were identified with 105 on the use of the DIEP flap in non-breast reconstruction. This suggests increasing recognition of the DIEP flap as a feasible option for reconstruction of most anatomical regions, especially in lower limb and head and neck reconstruction, followed by gynecological reconstruction. The DIEP flap was also utilized in the reconstruction of upper limb, thigh and hip defects. Less commonly, it has been used for penoscrotal, groin, sternal, buttock and abdomen reconstruction. Conclusions: The scientific body of evidence showed the robustness and versatility of the DIEP flap in non-breast reconstruction, with its relative pros and cons at different anatomical regions.

Indexed as

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP flap)free flapspedicled flapsreconstruction

Identifiers

PMID36819501
PMCPMC9929810
OpenAlexW4312975330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.