ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023
Association between heavy metal mercury in body fluids and tissues and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Re-thinking the link between exposure to mercury and blood pressure.Archives of toxicology · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of the risk of urolithiasis following parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.International urology and nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Endocrine-disrupting properties of heavy metal exposure contribute to the intergenerational effects on learning and memory.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Heavy metals as endocrine disruptors.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Geographical variations in metal exposure and metabolic disorders in Chile using an exposome approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review/expert statement on environmental risk factors of cardiovascular disease.Cardiovascular research · 2025Review
- Biomarkers for tracking metabolic changes pre-post nutritional epigenetics diet/intervention to prevent autism and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders in children.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Soil and water pollution and cardiovascular disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Biochemical study of the risk of diabetes, prediabetic and insulin resistance in car painters and its association with mercury exposure: a retrospective case-control study.Toxicology research · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the cognitive, physiological, and biomarker effects of heavy metal exposure in Wistar rats.Veterinary world · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have shown that the relationship between mercury exposure and diabetes is controversial. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between mercury exposure and diabetes using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases for cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort studies assessing the correlation between mercury exposure and diabetes in any population. Details of each included study were extracted using a pre-designed Excel spreadsheet. Quality assessment of cohort and case-control studies used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), whereas cross-sectional studies were assessed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) scale. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were employed to assess heterogeneity sources. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to evaluate publication bias. Results: Our meta-analysis included 8 eligible articles, comprising a total of 40,891 subjects, reporting mercury OR and/or concentrations. Among the included studies, one was a case control, one was a cohort study, and the rest were cross-sectional studies. Two studies were rated as high quality and six as medium quality. The results revealed no link between mercury exposure and diabetes (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.55, n=6, I Conclusions: No significant relationship was observed between mercury and diabetes mellitus. However, more well-designed studies on mercury exposure and diabetes risk are still needed, particularly on the type of mercury (i.e., elemental, inorganic, and organic), exposure time and dose, type of biological specimen, and the population's sex and age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.