Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819467›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2022

Resident training in brachytherapy in France: A 10-year update after the first survey of SFJRO members.

Manon Kissel, Luc Ollivier, Ingrid Fumagalli, Pascal Pommier, Cyrus Chargari, Pierre Blanchard, Didier Peiffert, Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi, Cooperative groups: French Society of Young Radiation Oncologists (Société Française des Jeunes Radiothérapeutes Oncologues – SFJRO) Brachytherapy Group of the French Society of Radiation Oncologists (Groupe Curiethérapie de la Société Française de Radiothérapie Oncologique – SFRO)

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Survey on brachytherapy training among radiation oncology residents in the German-speaking regions of Europe.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Manon KisselRadiotherapy Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Luc OllivierRadiotherapy Department, CHRU Morvan de Brest, Brest, France.
Ingrid FumagalliRadiotherapy Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Pascal PommierRadiotherapy Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon Cedex, France.
Cyrus ChargariRadiotherapy Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Pierre BlanchardRadiotherapy Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Didier PeiffertRadiotherapy Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Jean-Michel Hannoun-LeviRadiotherapy Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Cooperative groups: French Society of Young Radiation Oncologists (Société Française des Jeunes Radiothérapeutes Oncologues – SFJRO) Brachytherapy Group of the French Society of Radiation Oncologists (Groupe Curiethérapie de la Société Française de Radiothérapie Oncologique – SFRO)
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRGénérale de Santé · FRInstitut Curie · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: A previous survey conducted in 2012 showed that 82% of radiation oncology residents felt they were not receiving optimal brachytherapy training. With almost 10 years of hindsight, the aim was to update these results. Material and methods: An anonymized questionnaire based on the 2012 survey was submitted to the 161 French residents enrolled in the 2021 French Society of Young Radiation Oncologists (Société Française des Jeunes Radiothérapeutes Oncologues - SFJRO) national brachytherapy courses. Results: With a participation rate of 73%, 86% of the residents were interested in brachytherapy, but 80% consider their training in brachytherapy insufficient. 88% and 69% of the residents stated that they knew gynecological and prostate brachytherapy indications correctly, respectively. The residents have achieved proficiency in the technique of brachytherapy of vaginal vault in 36% (compared with 21% in 2012), utero-vaginal in 13% (12% in 2012), including 4% with interstitial implants, and prostate in only 4% (4% in 2012). In their brachytherapy internships, 18% of the residents declared having no role or an observational role. The main obstacles to training were the need to go to several centers to see several indications (85%), lack of brachytherapy activity in the center (72%), and the difficulty of freeing themselves from hospital duties (71%). Conclusions: With results globally stable compared with 2012, brachytherapy training needs improvement. In the absence of a mandatory internship in a reference center or dedicated fellowships, residents must have protected access to training sites by favoring inter-hospital exchanges.

Indexed as

brachytherapyeducationinternship and residencyprogram evaluationsurveyteaching

Identifiers

PMID36819467
PMCPMC9924148
OpenAlexW4316652084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.