Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819332›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

A Compendium on Perinatal Autopsy in Neonats.

Joshi Abishake, Sudhir Ninave, Akshunna Keerti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshi AbishakeMedicine and Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Sudhir NinaveForensic Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Akshunna KeertiMedicine and Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professionals who work in perinatal care must understand the advantages and disadvantages of perinatal autopsy since they are an essential tool for determining fetal and neonatal mortality. Perinatal is the period five months before one month after birth, while prenatal is before birth. The traditional prenatal autopsy is still the gold standard for establishing the cause of death and providing an accurate report, notwithstanding the development of new technology. The ideal locations for a prenatal autopsy are tertiary institutes that offer these procedures. It emphasizes the need for systematic histopathologic sampling, rigorous record-keeping, technological adaptation, and wise laboratory test use. When a laboratory does a microbiologic examination with a focus on the genital tract and neonatal problems, it is very beneficial. Karyotyping needs to be selective and works best when there are many aberrations if resources are to be saved. A perinatal autopsy is insufficient without examining the placenta, and severe lesions should be distinguished from deformities and abnormalities brought on by fetal death. In addition to providing epidemiology teams and auditing committees with high-quality data, the pathologist's role in perinatal medicine also includes participating in the multidisciplinary management of fetal abnormalities identified during pregnancy, monitoring the patterns of iatrogenic disease, and aiding the perinatal grief management process. Investigations into complicated multiple pregnancies, hydrops, bone dysplasias, and unexpected intrauterine fetal deaths provide unique obstacles and diagnostic difficulties. There hasn't been any research that contrasts postmortem computed tomography with postmortem x-rays in pregnant women, as far as we know. Histological analysis of many perinatal autopsies revealed healthy developing tissues. Only a tiny percentage of histological abnormalities can be expected in fetal anomaly terminations. On prenatal imaging, many organ abnormalities are commonly anticipated. A thorough database search was done in Pubmed, Medline, and Scopus using the phrases "fetal abnormalities," "karyotyping," "fetal abnormality," "postmortem," and "perinatal autopsy."

Indexed as

fetal abnormalityfetal anomalieskaryotypingperinatal autopsypostmortem

Identifiers

PMID36819332
PMCPMC9933892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.