ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Automated measurement of leg length discrepancy from infancy to adolescence based on cascaded LLDNet and comprehensive assessment.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current applications and challenges of artificial intelligence applied to diagnostics in pediatric musculoskeletal imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Clinical deployment and prospective validation of an AI model for limb-length discrepancy measurements using an open-source platform.European radiology · 2026Article
- Automated Measurements of Long Leg Radiographs in Pediatric Patients: A Pilot Study to Evaluate an Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithm.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: realistic clinical applications in the next decade.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Deep learning (DL) has been suggested for the automated measurement of leg length discrepancy (LLD) on radiographs, which could free up time for pediatric radiologists to focus on value-adding duties. The purpose of our study was to develop a unified solution using DL for both automated LLD measurements and comprehensive assessments in a large and comprehensive radiographic dataset covering children at all stages, from infancy to adolescence, and with a wide range of diagnoses. Methods: The bilateral femurs and tibias were segmented by a cascaded convolutional neural network (CNN), referred to as LLDNet. Each LLDNet was conducted through use of residual blocks to learn more abundant features, a residual convolutional block attention module (Res-CBAM) to integrate both spatial and channel attention mechanisms, and an attention gate structure to alleviate the semantic gap. The leg length was calculated by localizing anatomical landmarks and computing the distances between them. A comprehensive assessment based on 9 indices (5 similarity indices and 4 stability indices) and the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was undertaken to demonstrate the superiority of the cascaded LLDNet for segmenting pediatric legs through comparison with alternative DL models, including ResUNet, TransUNet, and the single LLDNet. Furthermore, the consistency between the ground truth and the DL-calculated measurements of leg length was also comprehensively evaluated, based on 5 indices and a Bland-Altman analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of LLD >5 mm were also calculated. Results: A total of 976 children were identified (0-19 years old; male/female 522/454; 520 children between 0 and 2 years, 456 children older than 2 years, 4 children excluded). Experiments demonstrated that the proposed cascaded LLDNet achieved the best pediatric leg segmentation in both similarity indices (0.5-1% increase; P<0.05) and stability indices (13-47% percentage decrease; P<0.05) compared with the alternative DL methods. A high consistency of LLD measurements between DL and the ground truth was also observed using Bland-Altman analysis [Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) =0.94; mean bias =0.003 cm]. The sensitivity and specificity established for LLD >5 mm were 0.792 and 0.962, respectively, while those for LLD >10 mm were 0.938 and 0.992, respectively. Conclusions: The cascaded LLDNet was able to achieve promising pediatric leg segmentation and LLD measurement on radiography. A comprehensive assessment in terms of similarity, stability, and measurement consistency is essential in computer-aided LLD measurement of pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.