Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819274›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Deep learning based dental implant failure prediction from periapical and panoramic films.

Chunan Zhang, Linfeng Fan, Shisheng Zhang, Jun Zhao, Yingxin Gu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunan Zhang *Department of Implant Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Linfeng Fan *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth's People Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shisheng ZhangIntanx Life (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Jun ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Yingxin GuDepartment of Implant Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dental implant failure is a critical condition that can seriously compromise therapeutic efficacy. Insufficient bone volume, unfavorable bone quality, periodontal bone loss, and systemic conditions, including osteopenia/osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus, have been associated with implant failure. Early indicators of potential implant failure could help mitigate the risk of severe complications. This study aimed to develop an effective implant outcome prediction model using dental periapical and panoramic films. Methods: A total of 248 patients (89 with failed implants and 159 with successful implants) were examined. A total of 529 periapical images and 551 panoramic images were collected from the patients for a deep learning-based model. Based on radiographic peri-implant alveolar bone pattern, implant outcome was divided into three categories: implant failure with marginal bone loss, implant failure without marginal bone loss, and implant success. We extracted features using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) and built a hybrid model to combine periapical and panoramic images. A comparison among three categories of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was performed. The diagnostic accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score of the dataset were assessed. Results: Our model achieved an AUC (area under the ROC curve) of 0.972 for failure with marginal bone loss, 0.947 for failure without marginal bone loss and 0.975 for success. In all conditions, for periapical images alone, the diagnostic accuracy was 78.6%; the precision was 0.84, recall was 0.73, and F1-score was 0.75. For panoramic images alone, the diagnostic accuracy was 78.7%; the precision was 0.87, recall was 0.63, and F1-score was 0.66. Both periapical and panoramic images were used in our novel method, and the prediction accuracy was 87%. The precision was 0.85, recall was 0.88, and F1-score was 0.85. Conclusions: The deep learning model used features from periapical and panoramic images to effectively predict the occurrence of implant failure and might facilitate early clinical intervention for potential dental implant failures.

Indexed as

convolutional neural network (CNN)deep learningDental implant failurepanoramic radiographyperiapical film

Identifiers

PMID36819274
PMCPMC9929426
OpenAlexW4313897914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.