ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Deep learning based dental implant failure prediction from periapical and panoramic films.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models in Detecting Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Pooled it
- Precision periodontology in clinical practice: bridging omics and clinical decision-making.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Radiographic Diagnosis of Peri-Implantitis: A Comprehensive Review on Detection, Measurement, and Risk Stratification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Implant Dentistry: Clinical Validity, Diagnostic Performance, Surgical Planning, and Medico-Legal Implications-A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- AI detection of peri-implantitis on 2D radiographs: a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy assessment.Odontology · 2026Review
- Radiomics analysis of panoramic radiographs using machine learning for the detection of peri-implantitis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Fractal Analysis and Artificial Intelligence for Radiographic Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Improving dental disease diagnosis using a cross attention based hybrid model of DeiT and CoAtNet.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Magnesium-containing implants enhance bone healing: A mechanobiological perspective.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025Review
- In Silico possibilities to understand peri-implant bone healing- state of the Art.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Review
- Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Diagnosis of Periodontal/Peri-Implant Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnostic System: Implant Brand Detection Using Improved IB-YOLOv10 in Periapical Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Selection of density standard and X-ray tube settings for computed digital absorptiometry in horses using the k-means clustering algorithm.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Mapping the Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Analysis for Clinical Decision-Making in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of 3D Cephalometry Provided with Artificial Intelligence and Manual Tracing.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Long-term survival rates of tapered self-tapping bone-level implants after immediate placement: a positional effective rationale.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in dentistry and dental biomaterials.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2024Review
- Pioneering nanomedicine in orthopedic treatment care: a review of current research and practices.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental implant failure is a critical condition that can seriously compromise therapeutic efficacy. Insufficient bone volume, unfavorable bone quality, periodontal bone loss, and systemic conditions, including osteopenia/osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus, have been associated with implant failure. Early indicators of potential implant failure could help mitigate the risk of severe complications. This study aimed to develop an effective implant outcome prediction model using dental periapical and panoramic films. Methods: A total of 248 patients (89 with failed implants and 159 with successful implants) were examined. A total of 529 periapical images and 551 panoramic images were collected from the patients for a deep learning-based model. Based on radiographic peri-implant alveolar bone pattern, implant outcome was divided into three categories: implant failure with marginal bone loss, implant failure without marginal bone loss, and implant success. We extracted features using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) and built a hybrid model to combine periapical and panoramic images. A comparison among three categories of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was performed. The diagnostic accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score of the dataset were assessed. Results: Our model achieved an AUC (area under the ROC curve) of 0.972 for failure with marginal bone loss, 0.947 for failure without marginal bone loss and 0.975 for success. In all conditions, for periapical images alone, the diagnostic accuracy was 78.6%; the precision was 0.84, recall was 0.73, and F1-score was 0.75. For panoramic images alone, the diagnostic accuracy was 78.7%; the precision was 0.87, recall was 0.63, and F1-score was 0.66. Both periapical and panoramic images were used in our novel method, and the prediction accuracy was 87%. The precision was 0.85, recall was 0.88, and F1-score was 0.85. Conclusions: The deep learning model used features from periapical and panoramic images to effectively predict the occurrence of implant failure and might facilitate early clinical intervention for potential dental implant failures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.