Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819211›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biomaterials2023

Graphene-Based Materials in Dental Applications: Antibacterial, Biocompatible, and Bone Regenerative Properties.

A G Williams, E Moore, A Thomas, J A Johnson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. On the Use of Nanoparticles in Dental Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A G WilliamsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Space Institute, 411 B. H. Goethert Pkwy, Tullahoma, TN 37388, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5697-4769
E MooreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Space Institute, 411 B. H. Goethert Pkwy, Tullahoma, TN 37388, USA.
A ThomasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Space Institute, 411 B. H. Goethert Pkwy, Tullahoma, TN 37388, USA.
J A JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Space Institute, 411 B. H. Goethert Pkwy, Tullahoma, TN 37388, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-9275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene-based materials have been shown to have advantageous properties in biomedical and dental applications due to their high mechanical, physiochemical, antibacterial, and stem cell differentiating properties. Although graphene-based materials have displayed appropriate biocompatible properties when used in implant materials for orthopedic applications, little research has been performed to specifically test the biocompatibility of graphene for dental applications. The oral environment, compared to the body, varies greatly and must be considered when evaluating biocompatibility requirements for dental applications. This review will discuss

Identifiers

PMID36819211
PMCPMC9929215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.