Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819198›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?

Amelia Llerena, Krystal Tran, Danyal Choudhary, Jacqueline Hausmann, Dmitry Goldgof, Yu Sun, Stephanie M Prescott

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06885437 (Neonatal Intensive Care Nurses' Assessment of Preterm Infants' Pain and Sedation), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06885437 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Neonatal Intensive Care Nurses' Assessment of Preterm Infants' Pain and Sedation: Inter-Rater Reliability

TypeobservationalSponsorAcibadem UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled190ConditionsNurse Care CoordinationArmsPain and sedation assessment with the N-PASS scale by each nurse
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Local anesthetic techniques for analgesia in neonatal circumcision: a network meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amelia LlerenaMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Krystal TranBiobehavioral Lab, College of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Danyal ChoudharyDepartment of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Jacqueline HausmannDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Dmitry GoldgofDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Yu SunDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Stephanie M PrescottMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
University of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The assessment and management of neonatal pain is crucial for the development and wellbeing of vulnerable infants. Specifically, neonatal pain is associated with adverse health outcomes but is often under-identified and therefore under-treated. Neonatal stress may be misinterpreted as pain and may therefore be treated inappropriately. The assessment of neonatal pain is complicated by the non-verbal status of patients, age-dependent variation in pain responses, limited education on identifying pain in premature infants, and the clinical utility of existing tools. Objective: We review research surrounding neonatal pain assessment scales currently in use to assess neonatal pain in the neonatal intensive care unit. Methods: We performed a systematic review of original research using PRISMA guidelines for literature published between 2016 and 2021 using the key words "neonatal pain assessment" in the databases Web of Science, PubMed, and CINAHL. Fifteen articles remained after review, duplicate, irrelevant, or low-quality articles were eliminated. Results: We found research evaluating 13 neonatal pain scales. Important measurement categories include behavioral parameters, physiological parameters, continuous pain, acute pain, chronic pain, and the ability to distinguish between pain and stress. Provider education, inter-rater reliability and ease of use are important factors that contribute to an assessment tool's success. Each scale studied had strengths and limitations that aided or hindered its use for measuring neonatal pain in the neonatal intensive care unit, but no scale excelled in all areas identified as important for reliably identifying and measuring pain in this vulnerable population. Conclusion: A more comprehensive neonatal pain assessment tool and more provider education on differences in pain signals in premature neonates may be needed to increase the clinical utility of pain scales that address the different aspects of neonatal pain.

Indexed as

acute painchronic painclinical utilityneonatal painneonatal pain assessmentneonatespain assessment scale

Identifiers

PMID36819198
PMCPMC9932268
OpenAlexW4319027897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.