ArticleEJHaem2023
UK media reporting of NICE recommendation of crizanlizumab for patients with sickle cell disease.
Article in EJHaem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- UK media reporting of NICE recommendation of crizanlizumab for patients with sickle cell disease.EJHaem · 2023Article
- The emerging need to manage patient expectations of haemophilia gene therapy amidst media hype in the UK.Therapeutic advances in rare diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crizanlizumab was recommended for use in patients with sickle cell disease in the UK in October 2021 and received widespread media coverage. Accuracy of reporting is paramount in building trust with this group of patients who are often wary of the medical profession. We carried out an analysis of internet-based news articles and applied a validated scoring system to assess quality. 21 articles from 19 media organisations were identified. 71% of articles stated unproven benefits of the drug and only 14% were of satisfactory quality. The former was largely due to quoting of two NHS England press releases. Overstating of drug efficacy may be detrimental to the need to address healthcare inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.