ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2023
Prognosis and clinical features analysis of EMT-related signature and tumor Immune microenvironment in glioma.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- EMT and cancer: what clinicians should know.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Harnessing the tumor microenvironment: targeted cancer therapies through modulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Integrative analysis of EMT-driving genes identifies a prognostic signature and GJB2 as a potential biomarker in glioblastoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the most common primary malignant intracranial tumor, glioblastoma has a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. It has a high propensity for recurrence, invasion, and poor immune prognosis due to the complex tumor microenvironment. Methods: Six groups of samples from four datasets were included in this study. We used consensus ClusterPlus to establish two subgroups by the EMT-related gene. The difference in clinicopathological features, genomic characteristics, immune infiltration, treatment response and prognoses were evaluated by multiple algorithms. By using LASSO regression, multi-factor Cox analysis, stepAIC method, a prognostic risk model was constructed based on the final screened genes. Results: The consensusClusterPlus analyses revealed two subtypes of glioblastoma (C1 and C2), which were characterized by different EMT-related gene expression patterns. C2 subtype with the worse prognosis had the more malignant clinical and pathology manifestations, higher Immune infiltration and tumor-associated molecular pathways scores, and poorer response to treatment. Additionally, our EMT-related genes risk prediction model can provide valuable support for clinical evaluations of glioma. Conclusions: The assessment system and prediction model displayed good performance in independent prognostic risk assessment and individual patient treatment response prediction. This can help with clinical treatment decisions and the development of effective treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.