Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819123›Full record

SynthesisTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2023

Anonymity in Kidney Paired Donation: A Systematic Review of Reasons.

Kailing Marcus, Delphine Berner, Karine Hadaya, Samia Hurst

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kailing MarcusInstitute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Delphine BernerInstitute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Karine HadayaService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Geneva University Hospitals and Clinique des Grangettes-Hirslanden, Geneva, Switzerland.
Samia HurstInstitute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate reasons for or against anonymity that are pertinent to kidney paired donations (KPD). We conducted a systematic review of reasons using PubMed and Google Scholar until May 2022 and through snowballing. Inclusion criteria were publications that: 1) discussed organ donation anonymity; 2) was peer-reviewed; 3) presented at least one reason on anonymity. Exclusion criteria: 1) not published in a scientific journal; 2) grey literature and dissertations. Four researchers independently reviewed and selected papers based on the criteria, extracted text passages and coded them into narrow and broad reason types, selected reasons that were valid for kidney paired donations. 50 articles were included, 62 narrow reasons (

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementHumansKidneyLiving DonorsTissue and Organ Harvestinganonymityethicskidney paired donationorgan transplantationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36819123
PMCPMC9931741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.