ReviewActa clinica Croatica2022
CLINICAL COURSE OF THE DISEASE AND TREATMENT OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT LARYNGEAL TUMOR: RETROSPECTIVE FIVE-YEAR ANALYSIS.
Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of White Light With Narrow Band Imaging Using Flexible Laryngoscopy for the Detection of Local Recurrences After (Chemo)Radiation for Pharyngeal or Laryngeal Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025Trial
- Investigating additional malignancy rates and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Machine learning in personalized laryngeal cancer management: insights into clinical characteristics, therapeutic options, and survival predictions.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- BNIPL is a promising biomarker of laryngeal cancer: novel insights from bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to investigate clinical course of disease in patients with malignant laryngeal tumors with emphasis on various forms of disease recurrence (local recurrence, metastasis to regional lymph nodes, occurrence of second primary tumor). A retrospective research including 78 patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of squamous cell laryngeal carcinoma was conducted. Information on cancer stage, histologic grade, type of treatment and disease recurrence was obtained from medical history. Tissue samples of the patients were submitted to immunohistochemical analysis and assessment of Ki-67 proliferation index expression. The occurrence of second primary tumor was found to be related to the significantly higher Ki-67 proliferation index. The number of patients having not undergone oncologic therapy and remained free from disease recurrence was significantly higher than expected. Treatment outcome depends on patient age, histologic grade, radiotherapy applied, and clinical course of disease. It is necessary to define the predictive factors of various forms of disease recurrence more precisely in order to identify better treatment options for patients with malignant tumors of the larynx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.