Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Identification and validation of coding and non-coding RNAs involved in high-temperature-mediated seed dormancy in common wheat.

Hao Jiang, Wei Gao, Bing-Li Jiang, Xue Liu, Ya-Ting Jiang, Li-Tian Zhang, Yue Zhang, Sheng-Nan Yan, Jia-Jia Cao, Jie Lu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao JiangKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Wei GaoKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Bing-Li JiangKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xue LiuKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ya-Ting JiangKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Li-Tian ZhangKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yue ZhangKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Sheng-Nan YanKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jia-Jia CaoKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jie LuKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Chuan-Xi MaKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Cheng ChangKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hai-Ping ZhangKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNAnhui Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Seed dormancy (SD) significantly decreases under high temperature (HT) environment during seed maturation, resulting in pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) damage under prolonged rainfall and wet weather during wheat harvest. However, the molecular mechanism underlying HT-mediated SD remains elusiveSeed dormancy (SD) significantly decreases under high temperature (HT) environment during seed maturation, resulting in pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) damage under prolonged rainfall and wet weather during wheat harvest. However, the molecular mechanism underlying HT-mediated SD remains elusive. Methods: Here, the wheat landrace 'Waitoubai' with strong SD and PHS resistance was treated with HT from 21 to 35 days post anthesis (DPA). Then, the seeds under HT and normal temperature (NT) environments were collected at 21 DPA, 28 DPA, and 35 DPA and subjected to whole-transcriptome sequencing. Results: The phenotypic data showed that the seed germination percentage significantly increased, whereas SD decreased after HT treatment compared with NT, consistent with the results of previous studies. In total, 5128 mRNAs, 136 microRNAs (miRNAs), 273 long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and 21 circularRNAs were found to be responsive to HT, and some of them were further verified through qRT-PCR. In particular, the known gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis gene Discussion: These findings not only broaden our understanding of the complex regulatory network of HT-mediated dormancy but also provide new gene resources for improving wheat PHS resistance to minimize PHS damage by using the molecular pyramiding approach.

Indexed as

high-temperaturepre-harvest sproutingseed dormancytranscriptome sequencingwheat

Identifiers

PMID36818881
PMCPMC9929302
OpenAlexW4318820173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.