Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818790›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2023

Development of obstetric-hepatology services: defining optimal care and impact of pregnancy counselling on patient experience.

Mussarat Nazia Rahim, Catherine Hedley, Alex Frick, Yooyun Chung, Leonie Penna, Lisa Long, Catherine Williamson, Michael A Heneghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. FIGO guideline on liver disease and pregnancy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Reproductive health in the liver transplant recipient.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mussarat Nazia RahimInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7733-8278
Catherine HedleyDepartment of Obstetrics, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Alex FrickDepartment of Obstetrics, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Yooyun ChungInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Leonie PennaDepartment of Obstetrics, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Lisa LongDepartment of Obstetrics, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Catherine WilliamsonDivision of Women's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Michael A HeneghanInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-9064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Prepregnancy counselling (PPC) is an important aspect of care for women with chronic liver disease (CLD) and liver transplantation (LT), yet its impact has not been well described. This study aims to assess the experience of women attending a joint obstetric-hepatology PPC clinic in a single-centre unit. Design/methods: A retrospective questionnaire-based study in a tertiary unit within the UK where patients who attended the PPC clinic between March 2016 and July 2021 were invited to participate by filling in a questionnaire. Descriptive data and free-text content were subsequently analysed. Results: 108 women attended the PPC clinic over a 5-year period. Overall, 58/108 (54%) completed the questionnaire. Principal concerns regarding pregnancy included fears around deterioration in health (66%), maternal death (24%), pregnancy loss (66%), medication effects (60%) and disease transmission (36%). 17/58 (14%) patients felt the presence of multiple doctors was intimidating, however, perceptions improved by the end of the consultation.Overall, 44/58 (76%) respondents felt the clinic helped them reach a decision about pursuing pregnancy. Almost all respondents would recommend the clinic to others. There were no major differences in pregnancy outcomes between those that received PPC and those that did not. Conclusion: The PPC clinic facilitates a personalised approach to care and is well received by patients with CLD/LT. It is difficult to elucidate whether attendance alone impacts on pregnancy outcomes; registry data may be better placed at addressing this important question.

Indexed as

CHRONIC LIVER DISEASELIVER CIRRHOSISLIVER DISEASE IN PREGNANCYLIVER TRANSPLANTATION

Identifiers

PMID36818790
PMCPMC9933593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.