Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818766›Full record

ReviewJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Revolution: The Next Frontier in Gynecologic Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Veronica T Lerner, Grover May, Cheryl B Iglesia

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07413861 (Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07413861 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic (vNOTE) Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Suspension

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsProlapse Pelvic, HysterectomyArmsUterosacral suspension, Hysterectomy by vNOTES approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy in The Netherlands; A prospective cohort study.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veronica T LernerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY.
Grover MayDepartment of OB/GYN, ETSU College of Medicine, Department of OBGYN, Johnson City, TN.
Cheryl B IglesiaDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite guidelines that assert that the vaginal route for benign hysterectomy is preferred as the most minimally invasive approach, rates of vaginal hysterectomy remain very low in the United States. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) might reverse the trend. Potential advantages of vNOTES compared to traditional laparoscopic and robotic approaches include the potential for less pain, decreased operative time, improved cosmesis, and decreased risks. Importantly, vNOTES might allow for the conversion of laparoscopic and robotic routes back to vaginal due to surgeon factors.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryFemaleHumansHysterectomyHysterectomy, VaginalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresVaginaMinimally invasive gynecologic surgeryVaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeryVaginal surgeryvNOTES

Identifiers

PMID36818766
PMCPMC9913063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.