ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
The Effect of Digital Three-Dimensional Reality Models on Patient Counseling for Renal Masses.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07062393 (Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality Counseling on Improving Shared Decision-Making in Thoracic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality Counseling on Improving Shared Decision-Making in Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality Counseling on Improving Shared Decision-Making in Thoracic Surgery: Randomized Clinical Crossover Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Trial
- The psychological impact of using 3D printing and imaging technology for patient education: a scoping review.3D printing in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Patient counseling for treatment of renal masses is complex. It can be difficult for patients to understand their disease and make treatment decisions when being shown standard black-and-white, two-dimensional computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance images. In a telehealth setting, the patient-physician interaction can be even more challenging. We sought to determine the impact of using digital three-dimensional (3D) models during consultation visits for patients with renal masses. Methods: Forty-seven patients participating in a consultation visit for renal masses, both in-person and virtual, were shown a digital 3D model comprised of their kidney, renal mass, and key adjacent structures as part of their counseling. Patients then completed a five-question survey to assess the impact of the 3D model on their visit, with a sixth question administered to telehealth patients. Results: Thirty-five patients undergoing telehealth visits and 12 patients seen in-person were shown the digital 3D model and surveyed. Survey results were universally positive, with all Likert scores > 4.7 (1 - 5 scale). There were no differences between the telehealth and in-person groups. Patients noted the digital 3D model made telehealth visits as effective as in-person visits (average Likert score 4.94). Conclusion: Counseling for patients with renal masses can be augmented with patient-specific digital 3D models, leading to increased provider loyalty, lower levels of patient anxiety, and better understanding and shared decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.