Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818738›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2023

Predictive model for preoperative risk calculation of cerebrospinal fluid leak after resection of midline craniofacial mass lesions.

Denis A Golbin, Alexander V Vecherin, Vasily A Cherekaev, Nikolay V Lasunin, Tatyana V Tsukanova, Sergey N Mindlin, Michael A Shifrin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond Technical Failure: Development and Preliminary Prospective Validation of a Mechanism-Informed Recurrence Score Following Endoscopic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repair.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denis A GolbinDepartment of Craniofacial and Skull Base Surgery, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander V VecherinDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Vasily A CherekaevDepartment of Craniofacial and Skull Base Surgery, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia.
Nikolay V LasuninDepartment of Craniofacial and Skull Base Surgery, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana V TsukanovaLaboratory of Information Technologies and Artificial Intelligence, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey N MindlinLaboratory of Neuroanatomy and Cryopreservation, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia.
Michael A ShifrinLaboratory of Information Technologies and Artificial Intelligence, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia.
Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute · RUNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complex anterior skull base defects produced by resection of mass lesions vary in size and configuration and may be extensive. We analyzed the largest single-center series of midline craniofacial lesions extending intra- and extracranially. The study aims at the development of a predictive model for preoperative measurement of the risk of the postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak based on patients' characteristics and surgical plans. Methods: 166 male and 149 female patients with mean age 40,5 years (1 year and - 81 years) operated for benign and tumor-like midline craniofacial mass lesions were retrospectively analyzed using logistic regression method (Ridge regression algorithm was selected). The overall CSF leak rate was 9.6%. The ROSE algorithm and 'glmnet' software suite in R were used to overcome the cohort's disbalance and avoid overtraining the model. Results: The most influential modifiable negative predictor of the postoperative CSF leak was the use of extracranial and combined approaches. Use of transbasal approaches, gross total resection, utilization of one or two vascularized flaps for skull base reconstruction were the foremost modifiable predictors of a good outcome. Criterium of elevated risk was established at 50% with a specificity of the model as high as 0.83. Conclusions: The performed study has allowed for identifying the most significant predictors of postoperative CSF leak and developing an effective formula to estimate the risk of this complication using data known for each patient. We believe that the suggested web-based online calculator can be helpful for decision making support in off-pattern clinical situations.

Indexed as

AUC, Area Under the CurveCerebrospinal fluid leakCraniofacialCSF, Cerebrospinal FluidDecision supportModelsROC curve, eceiver Operating Characteristic curveSkull base

Identifiers

PMID36818738
PMCPMC9932183
OpenAlexW4317938572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.