ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2023
Surgical treatment of cerebellar metastases in elderly patients: A threshold that moves forward?
Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frailty indices in patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2023Pooled it
- The mFI-11 frailty index as a predictor of surgical outcomes in elderly patients with brain metastases.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Anatomically Precise Microsurgical Resection of a Posterior Fossa Cerebellar Metastasis in an Elderly Patient with Preservation of Venous Outflow, Dentate Nucleus, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pathways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Surgical resection for multiple brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of functional and survival outcomes.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2025Review
- Mapping Anatomical Landmarks of the Cerebellum Central Core: Enhancing Precision in Surgical Interventions for Cerebellar Lesions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of surgery for cerebellar brain metastases in elderly population has been the object of limited studies in literature. Given the increasing burden of their chronic illnesses, the decision to recommend surgery remains difficult. All patients aged ≥65 years, who underwent surgical resection of a cerebellar brain metastasis from May 2000 and May 2021 at IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", were analyzed. The study cohort includes 48 patients with a mean age of 70.8 years. 7 patients belonged to the II Class according to the RPA classification, 41 to the III Class; the median GPA classification was 1.5. Median pre-operative and post-operative KPS was 60. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 11; median 5-variable modified Frailty Index was 2. Overall, 14 patients (29%) presented perioperative neurologic and systemic complications. 34 patients (71%) were able to perform adjuvant therapies as RT and/or CHT after surgery. A higher CCI predicted complications occurrence (p = 0.044), while significant factors for a post-operative KPS ≥70, were i) hemispheric location of the metastasis, ii) higher pre-operative KPS, iii) RPA II classification. Median Overall Survival was 7 months. A post-operative KPS <70 (p = 0.004) and a short time interval between diagnosis of the primary tumor and cerebellar metastasis appearance, were predictive for a worse outcome (p = 0.012). Our study suggests that selected elderly patients with cerebellar metastases may benefit from microsurgery to continue their adjuvant therapies, although a high complications rate should be taken in account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.