Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818651›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2023

MicroRNAs in spinal cord injury: A narrative review.

Chunjia Zhang, Zuliyaer Talifu, Xin Xu, Wubo Liu, Han Ke, Yunzhu Pan, Yan Li, Fan Bai, Yingli Jing, Zihan Li and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Transcriptomics Insights into Spinal Cord Injury for Therapy Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chunjia ZhangSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zuliyaer TalifuSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xin XuSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wubo LiuSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Han KeSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yunzhu PanSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan LiChina Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing, China.
Fan BaiChina Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing, China.
Yingli JingChina Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing, China.
Zihan LiChina Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing, China.
Zehui LiSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Degang YangSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Feng GaoSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liangjie DuSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jianjun LiSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan YuSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNChina Rehabilitation Research Center · CNChinese Institute for Brain Research · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a global medical problem with high disability and mortality rates. At present, the diagnosis and treatment of SCI are still lacking. Spinal cord injury has a complex etiology, lack of diagnostic methods, poor treatment effect and other problems, which lead to the difficulty of spinal cord regeneration and repair, and poor functional recovery. Recent studies have shown that gene expression plays an important role in the regulation of SCI repair. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding RNA molecules that target mRNA expression in order to silence, translate, or interfere with protein synthesis. Secondary damage, such as oxidative stress, apoptosis, autophagy, and inflammation, occurs after SCI, and differentially expressed miRNAs contribute to these events. This article reviews the pathophysiological mechanism of miRNAs in secondary injury after SCI, focusing on the mechanism of miRNAs in secondary neuroinflammation after SCI, so as to provide new ideas and basis for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of miRNAs in SCI. The mechanisms of miRNAs in neurological diseases may also make them potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for spinal cord injuries.

Indexed as

biomarkersmicroRNAneuroinflammatory responsepathophysiological mechanismsspinal cord injurytherapeutic targets

Identifiers

PMID36818651
PMCPMC9931912
OpenAlexW4319039710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.