Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818576›Full record

ReviewMacromolecules2023

Ring-Opening Polymerization for the Goal of Chemically Recyclable Polymers.

Christopher M Plummer, Le Li, Yongming Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Macromolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Improving Circularity via Chemical Recycling to all Rings.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Design of Recyclable Plastics with Machine Learning and Genetic Algorithm.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Michael Addition-Elimination Ring-Opening Polymerization.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher M PlummerInternational Centre for Research on Innovative Biobased Materials (ICRI-BioM), Lodz University of Technology, Zeromskiego 116, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9027-7748
Le LiKey Laboratory for Polymeric Composite and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-2997
Yongming ChenKey Laboratory for Polymeric Composite and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2843-5543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial modern dilemma relates to the ecological crisis created by excess plastic waste production. An emerging technology for reducing plastic waste is the production of "

Identifiers

PMID36818576
PMCPMC9933900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.