ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2022
Gas-alternating-water infusion method with/without internal traction assistance: a novel technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal tumors regardless of gravity direction.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A network meta-analysis of strategies for endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures from the perspectives of efficacy, duration and safety.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Gas-alternating-water infusion method with/without internal traction assistance: a novel technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal tumors regardless of gravity direction.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using underwater technique has been developed to make colorectal ESD easier and safer. We have carried out a novel technique of colorectal ESD using gas-alternating-water infusion method for en-bloc resection of large colorectal tumors. Aim: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of colorectal ESD using the gas-alternating-water infusion method (GAW-ESD) with or without internal traction assistance depending on the level of exposure of the submucosal space, for large colorectal tumors (≥ 3 cm in size). Material and methods: All 8 patients were kept in the left lateral position during GAW-ESD as follows: (1) C-shaped mucosal incision. (2) The colorectal lumen was instilled with normal saline. Then the mucosal flap on the lower side of gravity was created with the help of buoyancy, followed by a V-shaped dissection both below and above the liquid surface, if necessary, assisted by internal traction using one-matching-many repositionable clips attached to one rubber band. (3) The post-ESD defect was closed underwater using repositionable clips. Results: GAW-ESD was performed successfully in 8 patients, five without internal traction, three with internal traction. The en-bloc resection rate was 100%. No perforation occurred. Only 1 patient suffered from post-ESD bleeding, which was resolved by endoscopic clipping. Conclusions: GAW-ESD with/without internal traction is safe and effective for en-bloc resection of large colorectal tumors, with the advantages of quick gas/liquid switch, stable platform, fixed position, buoyancy effect, counteraction design, dissection acceleration, heat-sink effect, optical zoom effect, and downsizing effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.