Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818418›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2022

Using Twitter Data Analysis to Understand the Perceptions, Awareness, and Barriers to the Wide Use of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the United States.

Arslan Erdengasileng, Shubo Tian, Sara S Green, Sylvie Naar, Zhe He

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arslan ErdengasilengDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
Shubo TianDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
Sara S GreenDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
Sylvie NaarDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
Zhe HeSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
Florida State University · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
SMARTer Healthy Choices: Optimizing a state-wide scalable intervention to improve alcohol and HIV self-management in adolescents and emerging adults (Project SUSTAIN)P01AA029547 · NIAAA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NICHOLS, SHARON L · 2021 to 2025
$6.5M
Systematic Analysis of Clinical Study Generalizability Assessment Methods with InformaticsR21AG061431 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BIAN, JIANG, HE, ZHE · 2019 to 2020
$793k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIAAA NIH HHS P01 AA029547NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

User-generated social media posts such as tweets can provide insights about the public's perception, cognitive, and behavioral responses to health-related issues. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is one of the most effective ways to reduce the risk of HIV infection. However, its utilization is low in the US, especially among populations disproportionately affected by HIV such as the age group of under 24 years old. It is therefore important to understand the barriers to the wider use of PrEP in the US using social media posts. In this study, we collected tweets from Twitter about PrEP in the past 4 years to identify such barriers by first identifying tweets about personal discussions, and then performing textual analysis using word analysis, UMLS semantic type analysis, and topic modeling. We found that the public often discussed advocacy, risks/benefits, access, pricing, insurance coverage, legislation, stigma, health education, and prevention of HIV. This result is consistent with the literature and can help identify strategies for promoting the use of PrEP, especially among young adults.

Indexed as

HIVNatural Language ProcessingSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID36818418
PMCPMC9937556
OpenAlexW4313452339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.