Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818394›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical innovation2023

Vaccine Innovation Meta-Model for Pandemic Contexts.

Beatriz C Fialho, Leandro Gauss, Priscila F Soares, Maurício Z Medeiros, Daniel P Lacerda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beatriz C FialhoBio-Manguinhos/Fiocruz Immunobiological Technology Institute, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil.
Leandro GaussProduction and Systems Engineering Graduate Program, Unisinos, São Leopoldo, RS Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5708-5912
Priscila F SoaresBio-Manguinhos/Fiocruz Immunobiological Technology Institute, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil.
Maurício Z MedeirosBio-Manguinhos/Fiocruz Immunobiological Technology Institute, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil.
Daniel P LacerdaProduction and Systems Engineering Graduate Program, Unisinos, São Leopoldo, RS Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Over the past decade, successive outbreaks and epidemics of infectious diseases have challenged the emergency preparedness and response systems of global public health institutions, a context in which vaccines have become the centerpiece to strengthening global health security. Nevertheless, vaccine research and development (R&D) is a complex, lengthy, risky, uncertain, and expensive process. Alongside strict, time-consuming regulatory compliance, it takes multiple candidates and many years to register a new vaccine. This is certainly not welcome in a global health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study aims to understand the R&D paradigm shift in pandemic contexts and its impacts on the value chain of vaccine innovation. Methods: To that end, this paper carried out a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis of 27 articles and reports (2011-2021) that addressed vaccine R&D in contexts of global health threats, disease outbreaks, epidemics, or pandemics. Results: The research findings are synthesized in a meta-model, which describes a fast-track R&D for pandemic contexts, its driving forces, innovations, mechanisms, and impacts in the value chain of vaccine innovation. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that, in pandemic contexts, a fast-track R&D process based on close collaboration among regulators, industry, and academia and leveraging enabling technologies can drastically reduce the time required to bring safe, stable, and effective vaccines to market by an average of 11 years compared to the traditional R&D process. Furthermore, pharmacovigilance and rigorous monitoring of real-world evidence became critical to ensuring that quality and safe products were authorized for use during a pandemic.

Indexed as

InnovationOutbreakPandemicResearch and developmentVaccine

Identifiers

PMID36818394
PMCPMC9924881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.