ReviewBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023
Characterization of human induced pluripotent stems cells: Current approaches, challenges, and future solutions.
Review in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory Convergence in Cell and Gene Therapy: Harmonizing Quality, CMC, and Approval Pathways Across the FDA, EMA, PMDA, and Emerging Markets.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Review
- De novo EHMT2 variants cause an autosomal dominant EHMT2-related Kleefstra syndrome via loss of G9a methyltransferase activity.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Generation of TCRγδ + T cells from human embryonic stem cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality control strategy for differentiating induced pluripotent stem cells into pancreatic β-cells before transplantation.Regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Engineering the next generation of allogeneic CAR cells: iPSCs as a scalable and editable platform.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- Review
- Frontier progress and translational challenges of pluripotent differentiation of stem cells.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Quality assessment strategy development and analytical method selection of GMP grade biological drugs for gene and cell therapy.BBA advances · 2025Review
- Preclinical biodistribution and safety evaluation of human iPSC-derived dopaminergic neural progenitor cells for Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Considerations for the development of iPSC-derived cell therapies: a review of key challenges by the JSRM-ISCT iPSC Committee.Cytotherapy · 2024Review
- Unlocking the therapeutic potential: odyssey of induced pluripotent stem cells in precision cell therapies.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024Review
- Efficient generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from urine samples of patients with Fragile X syndrome.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Overcoming the Variability of iPSCs in the Manufacturing of Cell-Based Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Stem cell-based approaches for alopecia: A narrative review of current and emerging treatment strategies.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) have demonstrated massive potentials for use in regenerative and personalized medicine due to their ability to expand in culture and differentiate into specialized cells with therapeutic benefits. However, in order to industrialize iPSC-derived therapies, it is necessary to address the existing challenges surrounding the analytics implemented in the manufacturing process to evaluate and monitor cell expansion, differentiation, and quality of the final products. Here, we review some of the key analytical methods used as part of identity, potency, or safety for in-process or final product release testing and highlighted the challenges and potential solutions for consideration in the Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) strategy for iPSC-based therapies. Some of the challenges associated with characterization and testing of iPSC-based products are related to the choice of analytical technology (to ensure fit-for-purpose), assay reliability and robustness. Automation of analytical methods may be required to reduce hands on time, and improve reliability of the methods through reducing assay variability. Indeed, we have shown that automation of analytical methods is feasible (evaluated using an ELISA based assay) and would result in more precise measurements (demonstrated by lower co-efficient of Variation and standard deviation), less hands-on time, and swift compared to a manually run assay. Therefore, in order to support commercialization of iPSC-based therapies we suggest a well-designed testing strategy to be established in the development phase while incorporating robust, reproducible, reliable, and potentially automated analytics in the manufacturing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.