ArticleArab journal of urology2023
Gene expression analysis and the risk of relapse in favorable histology Wilms' tumor.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence can help individualize Wilms tumor treatment by predicting tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy.Investigative and clinical urology · 2025Article
- Analysis of Wilms Tumour Epidemiology, Clinicopathological Features and Treatment Outcomes in 84 Moroccan Patients.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Characterization of Alternative Splicing in High-Risk Wilms' Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The effect of genetic variants of SLC22A18 on proliferation, migration, and invasion of colon cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Wilms' tumor (WT) relapse occurs in 15% of patients. We aim to investigate the association between the expression of several genetic markers and WT relapse risk. Materials and methods: The study included 51 children treated for WT at a tertiary center between 2001 and 2019: 23 patients had disease relapse (group A) and 28 remained relapse-free after at least 2 years of follow-up (group B). Patients with syndromic, bilateral synchronous or anaplastic WT were excluded. Autologous renal tissue from 20 patients served as control. Total RNA was isolated from tumor tissue and control. Gene expression levels of WT1, HIF1α, b-FGF, c-MYC and SLC22A18 were assessed using quantitative RT-PCR and normalized to GAPDH. Immunohistochemical staining for WT1 and gene expression levels were compared between the study groups. Results: Median patient age was 3 (IQR = 2-5) years and 36 (70.6%) had stage I disease. Baseline characteristics were similar between study groups. Relapse occurred at a median of 6.8 (2.8-24.7) months, predominantly in the lungs (11/23, 47.8%). Tumors that relapsed expressed significantly higher levels of WT1, HIF1α, b-FGF and c-MYC and lower levels of SLC22A18 (p < 0.001). Strong immunohistochemical staining for WT1 was seen in 73.9% of group A and 14.29% of group B (p < 0.001). These associations retained statistical significance irrespective of patient and tumor characteristics. Conclusions: Higher expression levels of WT1, HIF1 α, b-FGF and c-MYC and lower level of SLC22A18 are associated with increased risk of WT relapse. These genetic markers can serve as future prognostic predictors and help stratify patients for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.