ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Citalopram in the treatment of elderly chronic heart failure combined with depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value and risk correlation of serum heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) in chronic heart failure.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Cardiotoxicity Associated with Venlafaxine-Defining Features in a Series of Five Cases and a Call for Proactive Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical intervention effect of Xuefu Zhuyu decoction on chronic heart failure complicated with depression.World journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
- The therapeutic potential of traditional Chinese medicine in depression: focused on the modulation of neuroplasticity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Escitalopram-induced sinus bradycardia in coronary heart disease combined with depression: a case report and review of literature.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is an independent factor to predict the hospitalization and mortality in the chronic HF patients. Citalopram is known as an effective drug for depression treatment. Currently, there is no specific recommendation in the HF guidelines for the treatment of psychological comorbidity. In recent years, many studies have shown that the citalopram may be safe in treating of chronic HF with depression. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the citalopram in the treatment of elderly chronic HF combined with depression. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wanfang were searched from their inception to May 2022. In the treatment of elderly chronic HF combined with depression, randomized controlled studies of the citalopram were included. Independent screening and extraction of data information were conducted by two researchers, and the quality was assessed by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool. Review manager 5.4.1 was employed for statistical analysis. Results: The results of meta-analysis prove that the citalopram treatment for depressed patients with chronic HF has a benefit for HAMD-24 (MD: -8.51, 95% CI: -10.15 to -6.88) and LVEF (MD: 2.42, 95% CI: 0.51 to 4.33). Moreover, the score of GDS decreases, and NT-proBNP (MD: -537.78, 95% CI: -718.03 to -357.54) is improved. However, the comparison with the control group indicates that there is no good effect on HAMD-17 (MD: -5.14, 95% CI: -11.60 to 1.32), MADRS (MD: -1.57, 95% CI: -3.47 to 0.32) and LVEDD (MD: -1.45, 95% CI: -3.65 to -0.76). No obvious adverse drug reactions were observed. Conclusion: Citalopram treatment for depressed patients with chronic HF has a positive effect on LVEF and NT-proBNP. It can alleviate HAMD-24 and GDS, but the relative benefits for LVEDD, HAMD-17 and MADRS still need to be verified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.