ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2023
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Signatures of MASLD: How Genomics Is Redefining Our Understanding of Metabolic Liver Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Patterns of lipid profile and genetic variations in South Asians.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2025Review
- Impact of genotyping (Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Phospholipid Acyltransferases: Characterization and Involvement of the Enzymes in Metabolic and Cancer Diseases.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although metabolic-dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk, MAFLD predisposing genetic variants were not steadily related to cardiovascular events. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether membrane-bound O-acyltransferase domain-containing 7 ( Methods: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study including 77 subjects (38 MAFLD patients, 39 controls), between January-September 2020 using hepatic ultrasonography and SteatoTest Results: The rs641738 variant was not significantly associated with MAFLD, with a p-value of 0.803, 0.5265, 0.9535, and 0.5751 for codominant, dominant, recessive, and overdominant genotypes, respectively. The rs641738 variant overdominant genotype significantly predicted atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk algorithm in univariate analysis (-4.3 [95% CI -8.55 - -0.55, p-value= 0.048]), but lost significance after multivariate analysis (-3.98 [95% CI -7.9 - -0.05, p-value= 0.053]). The rs641738 variant recessive genotype significantly predicted ActiTest in univariate analysis (0.0963 [95% CI 0.0244 - 0.1681, p-value= 0.009]), but lost significance after multivariate analysis (0.0828 [95% CI -0.016 - 0.1816, p-value= 0.105]). Conclusion: No significant association was observed between rs641738 variant and MAFLD in the studied population. The rs641738 variant was found to predict ASCVD risk score and ActiTest in univariate linear regression analysis. However, the significance of both associations was lost after performing multivariate analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.