ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2023
Prognostic markers for ischemic stroke - are they truly reliable?
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Elevated troponin levels as a predictor of mortality in patients with acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- The value of platelet/lymphocyte ratio in young patient with acute ischemic stroke.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Despite extensive research, to this date there is no panel of biomarkers for the prevention and prognosis of ischemic stroke and there is still much incomplete and insufficiently researched information. Aim: We conducted a prospective, observational study between January and June 2020. The main objective of this study was to clarify the role of inflammation markers, i.e. neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), high-sensitivity C - reactive protein (hsCRP) in ischemic stroke and whether there is or not a correlation between these markers and carotid stenosis. Study design: In the study we included 150 subjects divided in two groups: study group - 100 subjects and control group - 50 subjects. Methods: Data collected during the research (at the time of patient admission): 1) biological sample: 5 ml of peripheral blood were collected in a vial with clot activator and separating gel, from which the following laboratory tests were performed: hsCRP, neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets. NLR and PLR were subsequently calculated as the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes, respectively platelets and lymphocytes), 2) paraclinical examinations: extracranial carotid Doppler ultrasound examination. Results: The results were impressive: high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were strongly, respectively moderately correlated with the severity of stroke (the severity being established with the NIHS (National Institute of Health Stroke) score. None of the inflammation markers included in the present study was correlated with carotid stenosis. Conclusion: hsCRP, NLR and PLR may potentially be prognostic markers for ischemic stroke, being of major help in preventing its possible complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.