Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818213›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare, science and the humanities2021

The (Contrasted) Ethics of Covid-19 and HIV: Will the Favor be Returned?

Hope E Campbell, Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir, David Augustin Hodge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hope E CampbellAssociate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Belmont University College of Pharmacy, 1900 Belmont Blvd, MCWH #330, Nashville, TN 37212, Office: (615)-460-6530, Email: hope.campbell@belmont.edu.
Jacinda C Abdul-MutakabbirAssistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice| Critical Care-Infectious Diseases Pharmacist, Loma Linda University | School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda University Medical Center |East Campus, 24745 Stewart Street, Shryock Hall Room 212, Loma Linda, California 92350, Office Phone Number: (909)-651-9221, Email: jabdulmutakabbir@llu.edu.
David Augustin HodgeAssociate Director of Education, Associate Professor at National Center of Bioethics in Research and Health Care, Director of the Bioethics Honors Program, Associate Senior Editor of the Journal of Healthcare, Science, and Humanities, Tuskegee University, 1200 W. Montgomery Rd., Tuskegee, Alabama 36088, , Email: dhodge@tuskegee.edu.
Belmont University · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · USTuskegee University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With 118,000 cases in 114 countries and 4291 global mortalities, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The origins were believed to be from Wuhan, China, and SARS CoV-2, a coronavirus, was quickly identified as the causative organism. Researchers at the National Institute of Health Vaccine Research Center identified the spike protein as the critical portion of the virus that allows for attachment to human cells. In just 66 days after identifying the genetic sequence, the first COVID-19 vaccine candidate began the enrollment of human subjects into a Phase I clinical trial. This accelerated effort was due to a collective and collaborative global response. Currently, one COVID-19 vaccine has been approved and two others have received an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Thus, there has been a clear comparison of the COVID-19 response efforts and that which was utilized in addressing the human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) epidemic. For over four decades, the HIV/AIDS epidemic has been historically defined by a disproportionate number of infections and related mortalities amongst racially and ethnically minoritized individuals, including those that identify as homosexual. While novel drug therapies have been developed for the treatment of HIV/AIDS; there have been key components employed amid the global health response to COVID-19, that have been absent from the management of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Majorly, the development and availability of vaccine against HIV/AIDS. Many of the ideas and initiatives that have resulted in a positive COVID-19 response and the eventual successful vaccination development; have been those learned from the trial and error of mitigating increasing global rates of HIV/AIDS infections. Hence, the question remains as to whether the lessons and approaches learned during the COVID-19 pandemic, namely vaccination development, will be applied to managing the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Herein, we aim to compare the HIV/AIDS epidemic and COVID-19 pandemic, by describing how the fight against HIV/AIDs equipped global scientific leaders with effective strategies to overcome future public health crises (COVID-19), discuss the ethical considerations associated with the differences in the global health responses to the HIV/ AIDS epidemic versus the COVID-19 pandemic, and finally, identify lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic that can be applied to the quest for an HIV/AIDS vaccine..

Indexed as

AIDSbioethicsCOVID-19epidemicethicsHIVpandemicpublic health ethics

Identifiers

PMID36818213
PMCPMC9930501
OpenAlexW4321612153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.