Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818025›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Undergraduate students' perception of the Indian dental curriculum: A focus-group based, multi-centric questionnaire survey.

Rhythm Bains, Vaishnavi Parikh, Pragya Pandey

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rhythm BainsDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Vaishnavi ParikhFaculty of Dental Sciences, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Pragya PandeyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: the present study was designed to take a student's perception regarding the current dental education curriculum. Methodology: A structured, pre-validated questionnaire made on Google Forms was shared amongst participants pursuing undergraduate dental program in a DCI recognized dental college via e-mail, Facebook or WhatsApp. The questionnaire consisted of questions about the admission procedure (5questions), curriculum design (12 questions) teaching methods (5 questions) and assessment (5 questions) methods. The respondents were divided into 2 focus groups; Pre-clinical: BDS first & second year students and Clinical: BDS third & fourth year students. Results: The questionnaire was circulated amongst a total of 510 potential candidates, out of which 403 responded (response rate 79%). 48.4% (195/403) were from government dental colleges and 51.6% (206/403) were from private dental colleges. Preclinical group had 89 students (1st year = 27, 2nd year = 62) and clinical group 344 students (3rd year = 138, 4th year = 176). Students of both focus groups responded similarly to many questions relating to curriculum (need of syllabus revision, p = 0.912; horizontal/vertical integration, p = 0.076; and early clinical exposure p = 0.843), teaching methods (need of mixed teaching methods) and assessment methods (methods which are not based on quota-chasing p = 0.588). Statistically significant difference was seen to "whether the students are able to retain or relate to the basic sciences subjects taught in first & second year" (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Students expressed a need for a horizontal & vertical integration of topics, frequent syllabus revision, Early Clinical Exposure, a mixed teaching method, and better assessment methods.

Indexed as

Competency basedCurriculumDental

Identifiers

PMID36818025
PMCPMC9929735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.