Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818021›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023

Validation of automated positive cell and region detection of immunohistochemically stained laryngeal tumor tissue using digital image analysis.

Hilde J G Smits, Justin E Swartz, Marielle E P Philippens, Remco de Bree, Johannes H A M Kaanders, Sjors A Koppes, Gerben E Breimer, Stefan M Willems

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial intelligence-based quantification of epidermal proliferation and apoptosis in human skin.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hilde J G SmitsDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Justin E SwartzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marielle E P PhilippensDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johannes H A M KaandersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sjors A KoppesDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gerben E BreimerDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Stefan M WillemsDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to validate a digital image analysis (DIA) workflow for automatic positive cell detection and positive region delineation for immunohistochemical hypoxia markers with a nuclear (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α [HIF-1α]) and a cytoplasmic (pimonidazole [PIMO]) staining pattern. Materials and methods: 101 tissue fragments from 44 laryngeal tumor biopsies were immunohistochemically stained for HIF-1α and PIMO. QuPath was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and to delineate positive regions automatically. For HIF-1α, only cells with strong staining were considered positive. Three dedicated head and neck pathologists scored the percentage of positive cells using three categories (0: <1%; 1: 1%-33%; 2: >33%;). The pathologists also delineated the positive regions on 14 corresponding PIMO and HIF-1α-stained fragments. The consensus between observers was used as the reference standard and was compared to the automatic delineation. Results: Agreement between categorical positivity scores was 76.2% and 65.4% for PIMO and HIF-1α, respectively. In all cases of disagreement in HIF-1α fragments, the DIA underestimated the percentage of positive cells. As for the region detection, the DIA correctly detected most positive regions on PIMO fragments (false positive area=3.1%, false negative area=0.7%). In HIF-1α, the DIA missed some positive regions (false positive area=1.3%, false negative area=9.7%). Conclusions: Positive cell and region detection on biopsy material is feasible, but further optimization is needed before unsupervised use. Validation at varying DAB staining intensities is hampered by lack of reliability of the gold standard (i.e., visual human interpretation). Nevertheless, the DIA method has the potential to be used as a tool to assist pathologists in the analysis of IHC staining.

Indexed as

Biomarker analysisComputational pathologyPositive cell detectionPositive region detectionValidation

Identifiers

PMID36818021
PMCPMC9930147
OpenAlexW4318447286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.