Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818020›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023

Automated detection and delineation of lymph nodes in haematoxylin & eosin stained digitised slides.

Manon Beuque, Derek R Magee, Avishek Chatterjee, Henry C Woodruff, Ruth E Langley, William Allum, Matthew G Nankivell, David Cunningham, Philippe Lambin, Heike I Grabsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Manon BeuqueDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Derek R MageeSchool of Computing, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom.
Avishek ChatterjeeDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Henry C WoodruffDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ruth E LangleyMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn, WC1V 6LJ London, United Kingdom.
William AllumDepartment of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, The Royal Marsden Fulham Road, SW3 6JJ London, United Kingdom.
Matthew G NankivellMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn, WC1V 6LJ London, United Kingdom.
David CunninghamDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, The Royal Marsden Fulham Road, SW3 6JJ London, United Kingdom.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Heike I GrabschDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan, 25 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer (OeGC) is guided by disease stage, patient performance status and preferences. Lymph node (LN) status is one of the strongest prognostic factors for OeGC patients. However, survival varies between patients with the same disease stage and LN status. We recently showed that LN size from patients with OeGC might also have prognostic value, thus making delineations of LNs essential for size estimation and the extraction of other imaging biomarkers. We hypothesized that a machine learning workflow is able to: (1) find digital H&E stained slides containing LNs, (2) create a scoring system providing degrees of certainty for the results, and (3) delineate LNs in those images. To train and validate the pipeline, we used 1695 H&E slides from the OE02 trial. The dataset was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%). The model was tested on an external dataset of 826 H&E slides from the OE05 trial. U-Net architecture was used to generate prediction maps from which predefined features were extracted. These features were subsequently used to train an XGBoost model to determine if a region truly contained a LN. With our innovative method, the balanced accuracies of the LN detection were 0.93 on the validation dataset (0.83 on the test dataset) compared to 0.81 (0.81) on the validation (test) datasets when using the standard method of thresholding U-Net predictions to arrive at a binary mask. Our method allowed for the creation of an "uncertain" category, and partly limited false-positive predictions on the external dataset. The mean Dice score was 0.73 (0.60) per-image and 0.66 (0.48) per-LN for the validation (test) datasets. Our pipeline detects images with LNs more accurately than conventional methods, and high-throughput delineation of LNs can facilitate future LN content analyses of large datasets.

Indexed as

AUC, area under the curveAutodelineationDeep learningDigital pathologyDL, deep learningExplainabilityH&E, haematoxylin and eosinLN, lymph nodeLymph nodesOeGC, Oeosphageal and gastric cancersOesophageal cancerROC, receiver operating characteristic

Identifiers

PMID36818020
PMCPMC9932489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.